From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e23smtp07.au.ibm.com (e23smtp07.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 187DD1A019A for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:51:51 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp07.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:51:50 +1000 Received: from d23relay07.au.ibm.com (d23relay07.au.ibm.com [9.190.26.37]) by d23dlp02.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0462BB0040 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:51:48 +1100 (EST) Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (d23av01.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.96]) by d23relay07.au.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t2H9peKI25821186 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:51:48 +1100 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t2H9pEOM031533 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:51:15 +1100 Message-ID: <5507F8FA.7040004@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:20:50 +0530 From: Anshuman Khandual MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Kurz , Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] powerpc/vphn: parsing code rewrite References: <20150223151412.21565.2251.stgit@bahia.local> <20150223151437.21565.8231.stgit@bahia.local> In-Reply-To: <20150223151437.21565.8231.stgit@bahia.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/vphn.h b/arch/powerpc/mm/vphn.h > index 96af9a4..fe8b780 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/vphn.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/vphn.h > @@ -6,10 +6,10 @@ > #define VPHN_REGISTER_COUNT 6 > > /* > - * 6 64-bit registers unpacked into 12 32-bit associativity values. To form > - * the complete property we have to add the length in the first cell. > + * 6 64-bit registers unpacked into up to 24 be32 associativity values. To I guess its be16 instead of be32 here ^^^^