From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com (nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com [67.18.224.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD0768761 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 01:46:22 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1132311088.20016.88.camel@gaston> References: <20051107160939.GD3839@smtp.west.cox.net> <1131380422.27347.72.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> <20051107165453.GA29111@lst.de> <1131382971.27347.79.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> <1132131116.28963.75.camel@baythorne.infradead.org> <17274.63508.501761.748278@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <1132136755.21643.40.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <17277.10875.334722.856865@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <3F990F6D-7A3F-47CA-938F-968593678895@kernel.crashing.org> <1132285818.20016.79.camel@gaston> <20051118082358.GA2309@lst.de> <1132311088.20016.88.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <5534EC32-EE72-4019-A5D9-305F8348E4D9@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 08:46:49 -0600 To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: linuxppc-dev list , David Woodhouse , Tom Rini Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix 8250 probe on ppc32 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Nov 18, 2005, at 4:51 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 09:23 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 02:50:17PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt >> wrote: >>> On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 21:26 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: >>>> Paul or BenH, >>>> >>>> Would you like to enlighten us on this ambitious rework? >>> >>> First, some better & more generic routines for translating addresses >>> from the device-tree, and some more generic code for looking for >>> standard serial port using the above routines, among others ... >>> also, >>> set_preferred_console gets modified to use the previous list so >>> it can >>> detect the ports more reliably, etc .... >> >> so as a start can we move the code to a place in arch/powerpc/ where >> it can bee used by ppc32 _now_ because it fixes a real problem? You >> can add your encehancements whenever you get time to actually do it. > > My patch makes it ppc32 too :) udbg gets build on ppc32 along with > early > console etc... all with the same code path as ppc64. I still need to > test it on more hw and fix a few problems and hopefully will post it > before the week-end is over. How early on can we use udbg? I'd be interested to see how this is going to work out for 4xx/83xx/85xx w/built-in 8250's. - kumar