From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e28smtp01.in.ibm.com (e28smtp01.in.ibm.com [122.248.162.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 298A51A075B for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 23:48:09 +1000 (AEST) Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp01.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:18:06 +0530 Received: from d28relay01.in.ibm.com (d28relay01.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.58]) by d28dlp02.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC323940057 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:18:03 +0530 (IST) Received: from d28av04.in.ibm.com (d28av04.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.66]) by d28relay01.in.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t3RDlrBd2752888 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:17:53 +0530 Received: from d28av04.in.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d28av04.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t3RDlqTI025826 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:17:52 +0530 Message-ID: <553E3E06.6070605@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:17:50 +0530 From: Vasant Hegde MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jacek Anaszewski , Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] leds/powernv: Add driver for PowerNV platform References: <20150422234509.626d9dc7@ja.home> <55388254.4000606@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150423161342.55e9ac8f@ja.home> <1430086038.16571.78.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <553DE41A.5070703@samsung.com> <1430128435.16571.110.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <553E1A65.5080409@samsung.com> In-Reply-To: <553E1A65.5080409@samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com, cooloney@gmail.com, rpurdie@rpsys.net, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 04/27/2015 04:45 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > On 04/27/2015 11:53 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >> On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 09:24 +0200, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: >>> I was not aware that some other entity than the driver could be >>> interested in the information provided by DT node. I will no longer >>> object, provided that we will get an ack from DT maintainer. >> Jacket, >> My understanding is that we no longer need bindings to be accepted by DT >> maintainers. > > I've just skimmed through the patches in > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc and they indeed don't have > acks from DT maintainers. Sure.. I have addressed all other issues we discussed earlier. Will respin v4 soon. > >> That being said, I would like to review this one before it is accepted, >> as I haven't had a chance to do so yet :-) (I was mostly responding to >> you, I haven't caught up with the full thread yet). >> >> Please wait for an ack from myself or Michael Ellerman (the two powerpc >> maintainers). Either that or provide your ack and we'll merge it via our >> tree if we are happy with it. > > Since this driver is for LED subsystem it should better go via leds tree. > Sure.. Will send v4 and request benh/mpe to review/ack from powerpc side. -Vasant