linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Christoffer Dall" <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>,
	Bharat Bhushan <Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	Nadav Amit <namit@cs.technion.ac.il>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE..." <x86@kernel.org>,
	agraf@suse.de, Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	zhichao.huang@linaro.org, jan.kiszka@siemens.com,
	Mihai Caraman <mihai.caraman@freescale.com>,
	bp@suse.de, drjones@redhat.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
	r65777@freescale.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	ABI/API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	"open list:LINUX FOR POWERPC..." <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] KVM: define common __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW/HW_BP values
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 13:09:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <554C995B.6050907@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150508092346.GB24744@cbox>



On 08/05/2015 11:23, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 05:23:17PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Currently x86, powerpc and soon arm64 use the same two architecture
>> specific bits for guest debug support for software and hardware
>> breakpoints. This makes the shared values explicit while leaving the
>> gate open for another architecture to use some other value if they
>> really really want to.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> index ab4d473..1731569 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> @@ -310,8 +310,8 @@ struct kvm_guest_debug_arch {
>>   * and upper 16 bits are architecture specific. Architecture specific defines
>>   * that ioctl is for setting hardware breakpoint or software breakpoint.
>>   */
>> -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP		0x00010000
>> -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP		0x00020000
>> +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP		__KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP
>> +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP		__KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP
>>  
>>  /* definition of registers in kvm_run */
>>  struct kvm_sync_regs {
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> index d7dcef5..1438202 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> @@ -250,8 +250,8 @@ struct kvm_debug_exit_arch {
>>  	__u64 dr7;
>>  };
>>  
>> -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP		0x00010000
>> -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP		0x00020000
>> +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP		__KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP
>> +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP		__KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP
>>  #define KVM_GUESTDBG_INJECT_DB		0x00040000
>>  #define KVM_GUESTDBG_INJECT_BP		0x00080000
>>  
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> index 70ac641..3b6252e 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> @@ -570,8 +570,16 @@ struct kvm_s390_irq_state {
>>  
>>  /* for KVM_SET_GUEST_DEBUG */
>>  
>> -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE		0x00000001
>> -#define KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP		0x00000002
>> +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE		(1 << 0)
>> +#define KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP	(1 << 1)
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Architecture specific stuff uses the top 16 bits of the field,
> 
> s/stuff/<something more specific>/
> 
>> + * however there is some shared commonality for the common cases
>> + */
>> +#define __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW_BP	(1 << 16)
>> +#define __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_HW_BP	(1 << 17)
>> +
>>  
>>  struct kvm_guest_debug {
>>  	__u32 control;
> 
> We sort of left this discussion hanging with me expressing slight
> concern about the usefulness about these defines.
> 
> Paolo, what are your thoughts?

I would just lift these two KVM_GUESTDBG_* defines to
include/uapi/linux/kvm.h and say that architecture specific stuff uses
the top 14 bits of the field. :)

Paolo

      reply	other threads:[~2015-05-08 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1430929407-3487-1-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
2015-05-06 16:23 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] KVM: define common __KVM_GUESTDBG_USE_SW/HW_BP values Alex Bennée
2015-05-08  9:23   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-05-08 11:09     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=554C995B.6050907@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=Bharat.Bhushan@freescale.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mihai.caraman@freescale.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namit@cs.technion.ac.il \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=r65777@freescale.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhichao.huang@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).