From: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: paulus@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: powerpc: Enabling sys_kcmp for CRIU
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 13:53:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55509844.7010304@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150511103115.DFE85140187@ozlabs.org>
On 11/05/2015 12:31, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 15:30:21 UTC, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>> The commit 8170a83f15ee ("powerpc: Wireup the kcmp syscall to sys_ni") has
>> disabled the kcmp syscall for powerpc. This has been done due to the use
>> of unsigned long parameters which may require a dedicated wrapper to handle
>> 32bit process on top of 64bit kernel. However in the kcmp() case, the 2
>> unsigned long parameters are currently only used to carry file descriptors
>> from user space to the kernel. Since such a parameter is passed through
>> register, and file descriptor doesn't need to get extended, there is,
>> today, no need for a wrapper.
>>
>> In the case there will be a need to pass address in or out of this system
>> call, then a wrapper could be required, it will then be to care of it.
>>
>> As today this is not the case, it is safe to enable kcmp() on powerpc.
>
> That's mostly convincing. Though I see that s390 does have a compat wrapper,
> i386 doesn't. So who knows what that means.
>
> But, there's a selftest in tools/testing/selftests/kcmp. So can you run that as
> 32-bit and confirm it works? Then I'd be 100% convinced :)
Hi Michael,
I was myself a bit confused about this system call, so to be sure before
sending the patch I ran the selftest/kcmp series on 64bit, 32bit, and
also build it in 32bit and run it on top of a 64bit kernel without any
trouble...
Cheers,
Laurent.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-11 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-05 15:30 [PATCH] powerpc: Enabling sys_kcmp for CRIU Laurent Dufour
2015-05-11 10:31 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-05-11 11:53 ` Laurent Dufour [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55509844.7010304@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).