From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e28smtp03.in.ibm.com (e28smtp03.in.ibm.com [122.248.162.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C72BC1A0048 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 16:02:06 +1000 (AEST) Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp03.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 12 May 2015 11:32:03 +0530 Received: from d28relay03.in.ibm.com (d28relay03.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.60]) by d28dlp02.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8AB53940053 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 11:31:57 +0530 (IST) Received: from d28av01.in.ibm.com (d28av01.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.63]) by d28relay03.in.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t4C61vxx655742 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 11:31:57 +0530 Received: from d28av01.in.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d28av01.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t4C61ua6023766 for ; Tue, 12 May 2015 11:31:56 +0530 Message-ID: <55519753.4020807@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 11:31:55 +0530 From: Anshuman Khandual MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 00/13] POWER DSCR fixes, improvements, docs and tests References: <1428654612-23539-1-git-send-email-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1428654612-23539-1-git-send-email-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: mikey@neuling.org, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 04/10/2015 01:59 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > This patch series has patches for POWER DSCR fixes, improvements, > in code documentaion, kernel support user documentation and selftest based > test cases. It has got five test cases which are derived from Anton's DSCR > test bucket which can be listed as follows. > > (1) http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/dscr_default_test.c > (2) http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/dscr_explicit_test.c > (3) http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/dscr_inherit_exec_test.c > (4) http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/dscr_inherit_test.c > (5) http://ozlabs.org/~anton/junkcode/user_dscr_test.c > > So the derivied test cases have Anton's copyright along with mine but the > commit message as of now has only my signed-off-by statement. As Anton > mentioned before he would put his signed-off-by after reviewing these > modified test cases. > > NOTE1: Anton's original inherit exec test expected the child to have system > default DSCR value instead of the inherited DSCR value from it's parent. > But looks like thats not the case when we execute the test, it always > inherits it's parent's DSCR value over the exec call as well. So I have > changed the test program assuming its correct to have the inherited DSCR > value in the fork/execed child program. Please let me know if thats not > correct and I am missing something there. > > Changes in V3: > ------------- > - Minor changes to last couple of sysfs test cases > - Added .gitignore file for the new test directory Hey Michael/Ben/Mikey, Do you have any thoughts or updates on this patch series. Its already been a month for this latest version to be on the list.