Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] perf/kvm: Port perf kvm to powerpc

[Hemant Kumar <hemant@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

Hi Scott,

On 05/13/2015 08:52 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 21:34 +0530, Hemant Kumar wrote:
>> Hi Scott,
>>
>> On 05/12/2015 03:38 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 06:37 +0530, Hemant Kumar wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm_perf.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm_perf.h
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..30fa670
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm_perf.h
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
>>>> +#ifndef _ASM_POWERPC_KVM_PERF_H
>>>> +#define _ASM_POWERPC_KVM_PERF_H
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <asm/trace_book3s.h>
>>>> +#include <asm/kvm.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +#define DECODE_STR_LEN 20
>>>> +
>>>> +#define VCPU_ID "vcpu_id"
>>>> +
>>>> +#define KVM_ENTRY_TRACE "kvm_hv:kvm_guest_enter"
>>>> +#define KVM_EXIT_TRACE "kvm_hv:kvm_guest_exit"
>>>> +#define KVM_EXIT_REASON "trap"
>>>> +
>>>> +#endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_KVM_PERF_H */
>>> Please make sure that anything book3s-specific is named that way.
>> Are you suggesting to name it to something like _ASM_POWERPC_BOOK3S_PERF_H ?
> My concern is seeing a generically named "kvm_perf.h" include a file
> called "trace_book3s.h" which defines "kvm_trace_symbol_hcall" with
> presumably book3s-specific content, as well as wondering how much of the
> rest of the file would be applicable if booke PPC were to implement perf
> kvm.
>
> I don't know enough about perf kvm to answer that question, but I've
> seen enough cases of book3s or pseries specific code that was apparently
> written with the belief that no other ppc64 implementations exist, or
> that no other ppc implementations would want to implement a certain
> feature, to be suspicous.  Usually such cases can be dealt with after
> the fact (albeit not as easily as if things were organized/namespaced
> properly from the beginning), but this is uapi...
>
> -Scott
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Tried to address your comments in v4 :
http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org/msg89490.html
and
http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org/msg89485.html

-- 
Thanks,
Hemant Kumar