linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	Behan Webster <behanw@converseincode.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jan Willeke <willeke@de.ibm.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nikolay Borisov <Nikolay.Borisov@arm.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>,
	Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, SH-Linux <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux390@de.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Move the pt_regs_offset struct definition from arch to common include file
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:30:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5581BCD0.2040405@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqK3L9Hv9bhAtwAAXVYjLJBTOG9=4ddOo-SFqnD-_KieCQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/16/15 09:17, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:42 AM, David Long <dave.long@linaro.org> wrote:
>> From: "David A. Long" <dave.long@linaro.org>
>>
>> The pt_regs_offset structure is used for HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API
>>   feature and has identical definitions in four different arch ptrace.h
>> include files. It seems unlikely that definition would ever need to be
>> changed regardless of architecture so lets move it into
>> include/linux/ptrace.h.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c     | 5 -----
>>   arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 5 -----
>>   arch/sh/include/asm/ptrace.h | 5 -----
>>   arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c     | 5 -----
>>   include/linux/ptrace.h       | 9 +++++++++
>>   5 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
>> index ef9119f..fb45cf1 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c
>> @@ -59,11 +59,6 @@
>>   #define BREAKINST_THUMB        0xde01
>>   #endif
>>
>> -struct pt_regs_offset {
>> -       const char *name;
>> -       int offset;
>> -};
>> -
>>   #define REG_OFFSET_NAME(r) \
>>          {.name = #r, .offset = offsetof(struct pt_regs, ARM_##r)}
>>   #define REG_OFFSET_END {.name = NULL, .offset = 0}
>
> Can't you also move these? ARM is complicated with the "ARM_"
> prefixing, but the others appear to be the same. Maybe you can remove
> the prefix or redefine the macro for ARM.
>
> Rob
>

That would mandate that all the architecture-specific pt_regs structures 
would have to use a top-level named field for each named register.  That 
seems to me like an unnecessary restriction when the point of 
regs_offset_table is to provide the offset of the register inside an 
arbitarily complex pt_regs struct.  The often redundant definition of 
these two macros doesn't seem to me that high a price for that.

-dl

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-17 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-15 16:42 [PATCH 0/2] Consolidate redundant register/stack access code David Long
2015-06-15 16:42 ` [PATCH 1/2] Move the pt_regs_offset struct definition from arch to common include file David Long
2015-06-16 13:17   ` Rob Herring
2015-06-17 18:30     ` David Long [this message]
2015-06-30  3:29       ` Michael Ellerman
2015-07-22  4:46         ` David Long
2015-07-22  5:11           ` Michael Ellerman
2015-07-22 13:30             ` David Long
2015-06-19  4:19   ` Michael Ellerman
2015-06-19 14:12     ` David Long
2015-06-19 16:58       ` Kees Cook
2015-06-26 18:35         ` David Long
2015-06-23  3:32       ` Michael Ellerman
2015-06-23 13:48         ` David Long
2015-06-24  4:07           ` Michael Ellerman
2015-06-24 13:49             ` David Long
2015-06-15 16:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] Consolidate redundant register/stack access code David Long
2015-06-18 18:13   ` rkuo
2015-06-15 20:44 ` [PATCH 0/2] " Kees Cook
2015-06-15 20:58   ` David Long
2015-06-16  8:12 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2015-06-16 17:39 ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5581BCD0.2040405@linaro.org \
    --to=dave.long@linaro.org \
    --cc=Nikolay.Borisov@arm.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=behanw@converseincode.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rkuo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
    --cc=roland@hack.frob.com \
    --cc=rric@kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=willeke@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).