From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from muin.pair.com (muin.pair.com [209.68.1.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 537FD1A09FF for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 00:01:54 +1000 (AEST) Message-ID: <558FFE4E.703@tabi.org> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 09:01:50 -0500 From: Timur Tabi MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" , "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" CC: Nicolin Chen , Xiubo Li , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel , Fabio Estevam Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ASoC: fsl_ssi: enable AC'97 asymmetric rates References: <558FFAC4.2060608@maciej.szmigiero.name> In-Reply-To: <558FFAC4.2060608@maciej.szmigiero.name> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote: > /* Are the RX and the TX clocks locked? */ > if (!of_find_property(np, "fsl,ssi-asynchronous", NULL)) { > - ssi_private->cpu_dai_drv.symmetric_rates = 1; > + if (!fsl_ssi_is_ac97(ssi_private)) > + ssi_private->cpu_dai_drv.symmetric_rates = 1; > + Is this necessary? Why not just add fsl,ssi-asynchronous to the AC97 device tree node?