linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: mikey@neuling.org
Subject: Re: [RFC, 6/8] powerpc/prom: Simplify the logic while fetching SLB size
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:54:54 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55AE2C06.9080905@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150721102130.37D3B140DF7@ozlabs.org>

On 07/21/2015 03:51 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-21-07 at 06:58:44 UTC, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> > From: "khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> > 
>> > This patch just simplifies the existing code logic while fetching
>> > the SLB size property from the device tree.
>> > 
>> > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> > ---
>> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c | 12 +++++-------
>> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
>> > index 8b888b1..f6168e2 100644
>> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
>> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
>> > @@ -223,14 +223,12 @@ static void __init check_cpu_slb_size(unsigned long node)
>> >  	const __be32 *slb_size_ptr;
>> >  
>> >  	slb_size_ptr = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "slb-size", NULL);
>> > -	if (slb_size_ptr != NULL) {
>> > -		mmu_slb_size = be32_to_cpup(slb_size_ptr);
>> > -		return;
>> > -	}
>> > -	slb_size_ptr = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "ibm,slb-size", NULL);
>> > -	if (slb_size_ptr != NULL) {
>> > -		mmu_slb_size = be32_to_cpup(slb_size_ptr);
>> > +	if (!slb_size_ptr) {
>> > +		slb_size_ptr = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "ibm,slb-size", NULL);
>> > +		if (!slb_size_ptr)
>> > +			return;
>> >  	}
>> > +	mmu_slb_size = be32_to_cpup(slb_size_ptr);
>> >  }
> It's still ugly. Why not go the whole way:
> 
> 
> 	p = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "slb-size", NULL) ? :
> 	    of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "ibm,slb-size", NULL);
> 
> 	if (p)
> 		mmu_slb_size = be32_to_cpup(p);

Yeah this is better.

> 
> 
> And while you're at it, rename the function, it doesn't check anything. It
> initialises mmu_slb_size, so call it init_mmu_slb_size()?

Sure, will do.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-21 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-21  6:58 [RFC 1/8] powerpc/slb: Remove a duplicate extern variable Anshuman Khandual
2015-07-21  6:58 ` [RFC 2/8] powerpc/slb: Rename all the 'entry' occurrences to 'slot' Anshuman Khandual
2015-07-21  9:46   ` [RFC, " Michael Ellerman
2015-07-21 11:23     ` [RFC,2/8] " Anshuman Khandual
2015-07-21  6:58 ` [RFC 3/8] powerpc/slb: Define macros for the bolted slots Anshuman Khandual
2015-07-22  9:32   ` Michael Ellerman
2015-07-21  6:58 ` [RFC 4/8] powerpc/slb: Add some helper functions to improve modularization Anshuman Khandual
2015-07-22  9:19   ` Michael Ellerman
2015-07-21  6:58 ` [RFC 5/8] powerpc/slb: Add documentation to runtime patching of SLB encoding Anshuman Khandual
2015-07-22  5:51   ` Michael Ellerman
2015-07-22  5:57     ` Gabriel Paubert
2015-07-22  9:01       ` Michael Ellerman
2015-07-22 12:17     ` Segher Boessenkool
2015-07-21  6:58 ` [RFC 6/8] powerpc/prom: Simplify the logic while fetching SLB size Anshuman Khandual
2015-07-21 10:21   ` [RFC, " Michael Ellerman
2015-07-21 11:24     ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2015-07-21  6:58 ` [RFC 7/8] powerpc/xmon: Drop 'valid' from the condition inside 'dump_segments' Anshuman Khandual
2015-07-21 10:00   ` [RFC, " Michael Ellerman
2015-07-21 11:45     ` Anshuman Khandual
2015-07-22  4:52       ` Michael Ellerman
2015-07-21  6:58 ` [RFC 8/8] powerpc/xmon: Add some more elements to the existing PACA dump list Anshuman Khandual
2015-07-21 10:08   ` [RFC, " Michael Ellerman
2015-07-21 11:48     ` Anshuman Khandual

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55AE2C06.9080905@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).