linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hemant Kumar <hemant@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Yarygin <yarygin@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, warrier@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	paulus@samba.org, scottwood@freescale.com,
	sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] perf,kvm/powerpc: Add kvm_perf.h for powerpc
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 10:26:01 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <55EE6A61.3010301@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441602655.12945.5.camel@ellerman.id.au>



On 09/07/2015 10:40 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 17:51 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 12:18:47PM +0530, Hemant Kumar escreveu:
>>>> Should I try to process the 5 together, applying thest two first?
>>   
>>> Yes, this patchset needs to be applied before applying the other patchset,
>>> since there is a direct dependency on these two for the tooling part to
>>> work.
>>   
>>>> I see there are no acks from powerpc arch maintainers, how should we
>>>> proceed here? If there are no problems with the arch bits, and if it is
>>>> just to enable the tooling part, again, should I process the 5 as just
>>>> one series?
>>   
>>> The reason to split the earlier patchset into two was to separate the
>>> tooling/perf/ and arch/powerpc/ side patches, as asked by Michael..
>>   
>>> Here is the link to that discussion :
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org/msg86916.html
>>   
>>> If Michael is ok with the patches, you can process all the 5 patches
>>> together. Michael?
>> Michael?
> I'm not particularly happy with it.
>
> Can we at least remove this hunk from the uapi header:
>
> +/* This is to shut the compiler up */
> +#define KVM_ENTRY_TRACE ""
> +#define KVM_EXIT_TRACE ""
> +#define KVM_EXIT_REASON ""
>

Agreed, I didn't like this too, but I kept this because of the generic
perf userspace code that looks for KVM_{ENTRY,EXIT}_TRACE and
KVM_EXIT_REASON. We can remove this and put this hunk in the
userspace side.

Arnaldo,
Can we remove the dependency on uapi altogether (also suggested
by Scott) because it doesn't seem to fulfill much purpose? Rather,
hardcode the events in the userspace completely (since, tracepoint
event names are unlikely to change) ? Some of what is being done
by x86 already in kvm-stat.c where its defining kvm_events_tp[] and
its not using the macros, rather, the tracepoints directly. Macros are
only being used in builtin-kvm.c where the tracepoint names are
matched with KVM_{ENTRY,EXIT}_TRACE and when we are looking
for the key KVM_EXIT_REASON.

-- 
Thanks,
Hemant Kumar

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-08  4:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-31  6:48 [PATCH v6 1/2] perf,kvm/powerpc: Add kvm_perf.h for powerpc Hemant Kumar
2015-08-31  6:48 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] perf, kvm/powerpc: Add hcall related info to kvm_perf.h Hemant Kumar
2015-08-31 20:13 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] perf,kvm/powerpc: Add kvm_perf.h for powerpc Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-01  6:48   ` Hemant Kumar
2015-09-04 20:51     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-07  5:10       ` Michael Ellerman
2015-09-08  4:56         ` Hemant Kumar [this message]
2015-09-08  8:33           ` Michael Ellerman
2015-09-08 15:10             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=55EE6A61.3010301@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=hemant@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=warrier@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=yarygin@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).