From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thenzl@redhat.com>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24E7D1A04D3
 for <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Fri,  2 Oct 2015 22:49:10 +1000 (AEST)
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/34] cxlflash: Fix read capacity timeout
To: "Matthew R. Ochs" <mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
 "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>,
 Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Ian Munsie <imunsie@au1.ibm.com>,
 Daniel Axtens <dja@ozlabs.au.ibm.com>,
 Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com>,
 David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
References: <1443714773-9176-1-git-send-email-mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <1443714897-11795-1-git-send-email-mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
 Manoj Kumar <kumarmn@us.ibm.com>,
 "Manoj N. Kumar" <manoj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <560E7D40.2060508@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 14:49:04 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1443714897-11795-1-git-send-email-mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
 <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On 1.10.2015 17:54, Matthew R. Ochs wrote:
> From: Manoj Kumar <kumarmn@us.ibm.com>
>
> The timeout value for read capacity is too small. Certain devices
> may take longer to respond and thus the command may prematurely
> timeout. Additionally the literal used for the timeout is stale.
>
> Update the timeout to 30 seconds (matches the value used in sd.c)
> and rework the timeout literal to a more appropriate description.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew R. Ochs <mrochs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Manoj N. Kumar <manoj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Tomas Henzl <thenzl@redhat.com>

Tomas