From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D4C71A018F for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 00:47:00 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from e23smtp05.au.ibm.com (e23smtp05.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65450140D9C for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 00:47:00 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp05.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 23:46:59 +1000 Received: from d23relay08.au.ibm.com (d23relay08.au.ibm.com [9.185.71.33]) by d23dlp02.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80FD2BB0052 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 00:46:53 +1100 (EST) Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.138]) by d23relay08.au.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id t98DkYSL42074132 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 00:46:42 +1100 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id t98DkJjK022703 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 00:46:21 +1100 Message-ID: <56167395.8010703@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 19:15:57 +0530 From: Anshuman Khandual MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org CC: shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, mikey@neuling.org, james.hogan@imgtec.com, avagin@openvz.org, Paul.Clothier@imgtec.com, peterz@infradead.org, palves@redhat.com, nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com, emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com, oleg@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, dhowells@redhat.com, Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com, kirjanov@gmail.com, davej@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 00/28] Add new powerpc specific ELF core notes References: <1432048104-4695-1-git-send-email-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1432048104-4695-1-git-send-email-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 05/19/2015 08:37 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > Test Result > ----------- > ptrace-ebb PASS > ptrace-gpr PASS > ptrace-tm-gpr PASS > ptrace-tm-spd-gpr PASS > ptrace-tar FAIL > ptrace-tm-tar FAIL > ptrace-tm-spd-tar FAIL > ptrace-vsx PASS > ptrace-tm-vsx PASS > ptrace-tm-spd-vsx PASS > ptrace-tm-spr PASS > > NOTE: The above three test case failures are due to PPR context save/restore > in various paths. Still continue to debug the issue. This was an false alarm. The tracee process executed system calls with shmdt() and printf() after writing the new PPR value.