linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, mikey@neuling.org, nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] powerpc/numa: Use VPHN based node ID information on shared processor LPARs
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:25:50 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56209166.50602@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444962421.28419.3.camel@ellerman.id.au>

On 10/16/2015 07:57 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 14:32 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> On shared processor LPARs, H_HOME_NODE_ASSOCIATIVITY hcall provides the
>> dynamic virtual-physical mapping for any given processor. Currently we
>> use VPHN node ID information only after getting either a PRRN or a VPHN
>> event. But during boot time inside the function numa_setup_cpu, we still
>> query the OF device tree for the node ID value which might be different
>> than what can be fetched from the H_HOME_NODE_ASSOCIATIVITY hcall. In a
>> scenario where there are no PRRN or VPHN event after boot, all node-cpu
>> mapping will remain incorrect there after.
>>
>> With this proposed change, numa_setup_cpu will try to override the OF
>> device tree fetched node ID information with H_HOME_NODE_ASSOCIATIVITY
>> hcall fetched node ID value. Right now shared processor property of the
>> LPAR cannot be queried as VPA inializaion happens after numa_setup_cpu
>> during boot time. So initmem_init function has been moved after ppc_md.
>> setup_arch inside setup_arch during boot.
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
>> index 8b9502a..e404d05 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
>> @@ -553,6 +557,17 @@ static int numa_setup_cpu(unsigned long lcpu)
>>  
>>  	nid = of_node_to_nid_single(cpu);
>>  
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Override the OF device tree fetched node number
>> +	 * with VPHN based node number in case of a shared
>> +	 * processor LPAR on PHYP platform.
>> +	 */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR
>> +	if (lppaca_shared_proc(get_lppaca())) {
>> +		nid = vphn_get_node(lcpu);
>> +	}
>> +#endif
> 
> 
> That logic exposes a potential problem which you don't seem to have addressed.

You are right.

> 
> You're not updating the logic in of_node_to_nid[_single](), instead you're
> overriding it in *this one location*. But what about other code that uses
> of_node_to_nid()? It will still get the old device-tree value and so will have
> the wrong nid, won't it?

Yeah it will. of_node_to_nid() calls of_node_to_nid_single(). So we
can move in this VPHN override logic inside of_node_to_nid_single to
make it available across the board. But the original problem of timing
of vpa_init() still remains to make lppaca_shared_proc() check available
during boot time inside numa_setup_cpu() function.

      reply	other threads:[~2015-10-16  5:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-14  9:02 [RFC] powerpc/numa: Use VPHN based node ID information on shared processor LPARs Anshuman Khandual
2015-10-14  9:19 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-10-14 10:13   ` Anshuman Khandual
2015-10-16  2:24     ` Michael Ellerman
2015-10-16  5:55       ` Anshuman Khandual
2015-10-16  2:27 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-10-16  5:55   ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56209166.50602@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).