From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [103.22.144.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6C5E1A0D60 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 10:18:10 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from e23smtp09.au.ibm.com (e23smtp09.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F73B1409C2 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 10:18:10 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp09.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 09:18:09 +1000 Received: from d23relay08.au.ibm.com (d23relay08.au.ibm.com [9.185.71.33]) by d23dlp01.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4CF42CE8052 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 10:18:06 +1100 (EST) Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (d23av01.au.ibm.com [9.190.234.96]) by d23relay08.au.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id tA5NHiof35651784 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 10:17:52 +1100 Received: from d23av01.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av01.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id tA5NHYwM017794 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 10:17:34 +1100 Message-ID: <563BE375.2000309@au1.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:17:09 +1100 From: Andrew Donnellan MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Axtens , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org CC: mikey@neuling.org, imunsie@au1.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxl: use correct operator when writing pcie config space values References: <1446603849-26796-1-git-send-email-andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com> <87oaf8hwt2.fsf@gamma.ozlabs.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <87oaf8hwt2.fsf@gamma.ozlabs.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 06/11/15 10:05, Daniel Axtens wrote: > Given that there are no current users of this function, does this need > to go to stable? Does it actually fix a real (as opposed to theoretical) > bug? I tagged it for stable on mpe's request - I'm not fussed either way. Andrew -- Andrew Donnellan Software Engineer, OzLabs andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com Australia Development Lab, Canberra +61 2 6201 8874 (work) IBM Australia Limited