From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96C531A0CFB for ; Sat, 7 Nov 2015 22:33:10 +1100 (AEDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: allow cross-compilation of ppc64 kernel To: Segher Boessenkool , Scott Wood References: <1446724029-10884-1-git-send-email-laurent@vivier.eu> <1446844180.11597.13.camel@freescale.com> <20151106225549.GA21395@gate.crashing.org> <20151106233235.GA24762@gate.crashing.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Laurent Vivier Message-ID: <563DE160.505@vivier.eu> Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2015 12:32:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151106233235.GA24762@gate.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Le 07/11/2015 00:32, Segher Boessenkool a écrit : > On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 04:55:49PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 03:09:40PM -0600, Scott Wood wrote: >>> Why is GCC building ppc64 object files but telling the linker --oformat elf32- >>> powerpcle? Are different options somehow being passed to GCC in one case >>> versus the other? >> >> This was changed for GCC 6 in , could one of >> you check if that fixes this problem? If so we'll need to backport it. > > Actually it already has been backported, r228089. Thank you, I'm going to see if it can be included in the distro I use. Laurent