From: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
"James E. J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@odin.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, brking <brking@us.ibm.com>,
tom.leiming@gmail.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:1096!
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:57:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56531B3F.60503@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448234410.8209.3.camel@redhat.com>
On 23/11/2015 00:20, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-11-22 at 00:56 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 12:30:14 +0100
>> Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 20/11/2015 13:10, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 00:23 -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It's pretty much guaranteed a block layer bug, most likely in the
>>>>> merge bios to request infrastucture where we don't obey the merging
>>>>> limits properly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does either of you have a known good and first known bad kernel?
>>>>
>>>> Not me, I've only hit it one or two times. All I can say is I have hit it in
>>>> 4.4-rc1.
>>>>
>>>> Laurent, can you narrow it down at all?
>>>
>>> It seems that the panic is triggered by the commit bdced438acd8 ("block:
>>> setup bi_phys_segments after splitting") which has been pulled by the
>>> merge d9734e0d1ccf ("Merge branch 'for-4.4/core' of
>>> git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block").
>>>
>>> My system is panicing promptly when running a kernel built at
>>> d9734e0d1ccf, while reverting the commit bdced438acd8, it can run hours
>>> without panicing.
>>>
>>> This being said, I can't explain what's going wrong.
>>>
>>> May Ming shed some light here ?
>>
>> Laurent, looks there is one bug in blk_bio_segment_split(), would you
>> mind testing the following patch to see if it fixes your issue?
>>
>> ---
>> From 6fc701231dcc000bc8bc4b9105583380d9aa31f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
>> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 00:47:13 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] block: fix segment split
>>
>> Inside blk_bio_segment_split(), previous bvec pointer('bvprvp')
>> always points to the iterator local variable, which is obviously
>> wrong, so fix it by pointing to the local variable of 'bvprv'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
>> ---
>> block/blk-merge.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
>> index de5716d8..f2efe8a 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
>> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q,
>>
>> seg_size += bv.bv_len;
>> bvprv = bv;
>> - bvprvp = &bv;
>> + bvprvp = &bvprv;
>> sectors += bv.bv_len >> 9;
>> continue;
>> }
>> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ new_segment:
>>
>> nsegs++;
>> bvprv = bv;
>> - bvprvp = &bv;
>> + bvprvp = &bvprv;
>> seg_size = bv.bv_len;
>> sectors += bv.bv_len >> 9;
>> }
>
> I'm still hitting the BUG even with this patch applied on top of 4.4-rc1.
On my side, with the patch applied on top of 4.4-rc1, I can't get the
panic anymore.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-23 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-18 9:18 kernel BUG at drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:1096! Michael Ellerman
2015-11-18 11:06 ` Laurent Dufour
2015-11-18 11:10 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-11-18 11:17 ` Laurent Dufour
2015-11-18 14:03 ` Mark Salter
2015-11-19 1:02 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-11-19 8:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-11-19 15:35 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-20 14:38 ` Ewan Milne
2015-11-20 14:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-20 15:28 ` Ewan Milne
2015-11-23 6:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-25 9:04 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-25 17:56 ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-25 19:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-11-25 19:24 ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-25 20:23 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-11-25 21:20 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-11-25 18:01 ` Mike Snitzer
2015-11-25 19:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-12-04 16:59 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-12-04 17:02 ` Jens Axboe
2015-12-04 17:09 ` Takashi Iwai
2015-11-20 12:10 ` Michael Ellerman
2015-11-20 12:56 ` Laurent Dufour
2015-11-20 13:37 ` Mark Salter
2015-11-21 11:30 ` Laurent Dufour
2015-11-21 16:56 ` Ming Lei
2015-11-22 23:20 ` Mark Salter
2015-11-23 0:36 ` Ming Lei
2015-11-23 1:50 ` Mark Salter
2015-11-23 2:46 ` Ming Lei
2015-11-23 15:21 ` Ming Lei
2015-11-24 18:59 ` Alan Ott
2015-11-23 13:57 ` Laurent Dufour [this message]
2015-11-23 15:13 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-11-23 15:20 ` Laurent Dufour
2015-11-23 15:27 ` Ming Lei
2015-11-23 16:24 ` Laurent Dufour
2015-11-24 1:30 ` Mark Salter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56531B3F.60503@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=JBottomley@odin.com \
--cc=brking@us.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).