From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F7FA1A0191 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 02:21:27 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 15:21:24 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 729CE1B0805F for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 15:21:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.213]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u19FLMer5374168 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 15:21:22 GMT Received: from d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u19FLKam031698 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 08:21:21 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/18] cxl: sysfs support for guests To: Stewart Smith , imunsie@au1.ibm.com, michael.neuling@au1.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org References: <1454765345-7417-1-git-send-email-fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1454765345-7417-14-git-send-email-fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <877fifykej.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> From: Frederic Barrat Message-ID: <56BA03EF.8040507@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 16:21:19 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <877fifykej.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Le 08/02/2016 04:02, Stewart Smith a écrit : > Frederic Barrat writes: >> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-cxl >> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-cxl >> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ Description: read only >> Identifies the revision level of the PSL. >> Users: https://github.com/ibm-capi/libcxl >> >> -What: /sys/class/cxl//base_image >> +What: /sys/class/cxl//base_image (not in a guest) > > Is this going to be the case for KVM guest as well as PowerVM guest? That's too early to say. The entries we've removed are because the information is filtered by pHyp and not available to the OS. Some of it because nobody thought it would be useful, some of it because it's not meant to be seen by the OS. For KVM, if the card can be shared between guests, I would expect the same kind of restrictions. Fred