From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e23smtp07.au.ibm.com (e23smtp07.au.ibm.com [202.81.31.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2B721A0610 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:55:29 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost by e23smtp07.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 14:55:29 +1000 Received: from d23relay10.au.ibm.com (d23relay10.au.ibm.com [9.190.26.77]) by d23dlp03.au.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC459357803F for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:55:26 +1100 (EST) Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (d23av02.au.ibm.com [9.190.235.138]) by d23relay10.au.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u1J4tIpF41287734 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:55:26 +1100 Received: from d23av02.au.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d23av02.au.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u1J4sssr021231 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 15:54:54 +1100 Message-ID: <56C6A00C.5030602@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:24:36 +0530 From: Anshuman Khandual MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org CC: aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] powerpc/mm: Rename global tracker for virtual to physical mapping References: <1455711179-20357-1-git-send-email-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1455711179-20357-4-git-send-email-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1455806240.5284.19.camel@ellerman.id.au> In-Reply-To: <1455806240.5284.19.camel@ellerman.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 02/18/2016 08:07 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 17:42 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > >> This renames the global list which tracks all the virtual to physical >> mapping and also the global list which tracks all the available unused >> vmemmap_hw_map node structures. > > But why? Why are the new names *so* much better that we would want to go > through all this churn? Hmm, okay. Its kind of subjective but then its upto you. > >> It also attempts to explain the purpose >> of these global linked lists and points out a possible race condition. > > I'm happy to take the comments. Sure, will send across next time around separately.