From: Yongji Xie <xyjxie@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, corbet@lwn.net,
aik@ozlabs.ru, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
warrier@linux.vnet.ibm.com, zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/7] vfio-pci: Allow to mmap sub-page MMIO BARs and MSI-X table
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:46:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56EA8B14.4070808@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160316141013.GA21809@localhost>
On 2016/3/16 22:10, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 06:51:56PM +0800, Yongji Xie wrote:
>> Ping.
> This is mainly VFIO stuff, and Alex had some security concerns, so I'm
> not going to spend much time looking at this until he's satisfied.
>
> When I do, I'll be looking hard at the resource_alignment kernel
> parameter. I'm opposed to kernel parameters in general because
> they're very difficult for users to use correctly, and they lead to
> kernel code paths that are rarely tested and hard to maintain. So
> I'll be looking for an excuse to reject changes in that area.
>
> The changelog for 2/7 says it "replaces IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN with
> IORESOURCE_WINDOW." But even a glance at the patch itself shows that
> IORESOURCE_WINDOW is *added* to some places, and it doesn't *replace*
> IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN.
There is a problem with my statement. I mean we can use
IORESOURCE_WINDOW to identify bridge resources instead of
IORESOURCE_STARTALIGN here.
> The changelog for 4/7 says:
>
> This is because vfio will not allow to passthrough one BAR's mmio
> page which may be shared with other BARs. To solve this performance
> issue ...
>
> with no mention at all of the actual *reason* vfio doesn't allow that
> passthrough. If I understand correctly, that reason has to do with
> security, so your justification must be much stronger than "solving a
> performance issue."
OK. I will try to make my justification become stronger.
Thanks,
Yongji Xie
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-17 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-07 7:48 [RFC PATCH v4 0/7] vfio-pci: Allow to mmap sub-page MMIO BARs and MSI-X table Yongji Xie
2016-03-07 7:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/7] PCI: Add a new option for resource_alignment to reassign alignment Yongji Xie
2016-03-10 2:19 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2016-03-10 4:47 ` Yongji Xie
2016-03-07 7:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/7] PCI: Use IORESOURCE_WINDOW to identify bridge resources Yongji Xie
2016-03-07 7:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/7] PCI: Ignore resource_alignment if PCI_PROBE_ONLY was set Yongji Xie
2016-03-16 16:31 ` Alex Williamson
2016-03-17 11:35 ` Yongji Xie
2016-03-07 7:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/7] PCI: Modify resource_alignment to support multiple devices Yongji Xie
2016-03-16 16:30 ` Alex Williamson
2016-03-17 11:28 ` Yongji Xie
2016-03-17 12:40 ` Alex Williamson
2016-03-18 15:04 ` Yongji Xie
2016-03-07 7:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 5/7] vfio-pci: Allow to mmap sub-page MMIO BARs if the mmio page is exclusive Yongji Xie
2016-03-16 16:30 ` Alex Williamson
2016-03-17 11:29 ` Yongji Xie
2016-03-07 7:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 6/7] vfio-pci: Allow to mmap MSI-X table if IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP was set Yongji Xie
2016-03-16 16:31 ` Alex Williamson
2016-03-17 11:32 ` Yongji Xie
2016-03-07 7:48 ` [RFC PATCH v4 7/7] powerpc/powernv/pci-ioda: Add IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP for IODA host bridge Yongji Xie
2016-03-16 16:32 ` Alex Williamson
2016-03-17 11:38 ` Yongji Xie
2016-03-17 12:48 ` Alex Williamson
2016-03-18 11:51 ` Yongji Xie
2016-03-16 10:51 ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/7] vfio-pci: Allow to mmap sub-page MMIO BARs and MSI-X table Yongji Xie
2016-03-16 14:10 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-03-17 10:46 ` Yongji Xie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56EA8B14.4070808@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xyjxie@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=warrier@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).