From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
To: Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
jeyu@redhat.com, jkosina@suse.cz, jikos@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, mbenes@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] ppc64 livepatch: frameless klp_return_helper using odd TOC
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 13:23:01 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F34F85.7020408@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160323155858.GB27110@lst.de>
On 24/03/16 02:58, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> Since nobody liked the extra stack frame nor its workarounds, here is
> the next attempt. Assumptions:
>
> 1. Heuristics are bad. The better they are, the more subtly the
> way they might fail.
>
> 2. The TOC pointer is usually dividable by 4, if not by 8. An odd
> value never occurs.
>
> Conclusively, this patch unambiguously creates an odd TOC value when
> an ftraced function's global entry point is used. Ftrace_caller will
> then immediately fix it, and alongside gather the information whether
> the made call was local or global.
>
> In case of live patching this information is furthermore used to decide
> whether a klp_return_helper needs to be inserted or not.
> CAVEAT: any frameless klp_return_helper does not play well with
> sibling calls! There's an emergency exit that might work, at worst
> it will cause an oops, but it surely avoids a lockup.
> At least the live patching modules on ppc64le will need to be compiled
> using the -fno-optimize-sibling-calls compiler flag!
>
> Thanks go to Michael Matz and Richard Biener for reassurance about
> heuristics and pointers to the compiler flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Torsten Duwe <duwe@suse.de>
>
>
I missed this yesterday, not on cc, but caught it on the list today
Thanks for working on this. I did a quick look, so the CR+4 code plus heuristics for global/local call detection? I'll review this soon - hopefully tonight, but we have a long weekend coming up, so there might be delays. In the meanwhile feel free to add my signed-off-by for the CR+4 code. I am also looking at a different approach -- per thread lr0 stack.
Balbir Singh.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-24 2:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-23 15:58 [PATCH/RFC] ppc64 livepatch: frameless klp_return_helper using odd TOC Torsten Duwe
2016-03-24 2:23 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2016-03-24 8:04 ` Torsten Duwe
2016-03-24 11:06 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-03-24 10:14 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2016-03-24 10:27 ` Torsten Duwe
2016-03-24 15:58 ` Kamalesh Babulal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56F34F85.7020408@gmail.com \
--to=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=duwe@lst.de \
--cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).