linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Allen <jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ibmvnic: Defer tx completion processing using a wait queue
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:00:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <570D61E7.2090203@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460491940.6473.592.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>

On 04/12/2016 03:12 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-04-12 at 14:38 -0500, John Allen wrote:
>> Moves tx completion processing out of interrupt context, deferring work
>> using a wait queue. With this work now deferred, we must account for the
>> possibility that skbs can be sent faster than we can process completion
>> requests in which case the tx buffer will overflow. If the tx buffer is
>> full, ibmvnic_xmit will return NETDEV_TX_BUSY and stop the current tx
>> queue. Subsequently, the queue will be restarted in ibmvnic_complete_tx
>> when all pending tx completion requests have been cleared.
> 
> 1) Why is this needed ?

In the current ibmvnic implementation, tx completion processing is done in
interrupt context. Depending on the load, this can block further
interrupts for a long time. This patch just creates a bottom half so that
when a tx completion interrupt comes in, we can defer the majority of the
work and exit interrupt context quickly.

> 
> 2) If it is needed, why is this not done in a generic way, so that other
> drivers can use this ?

I'm still fairly new to network driver development so I'm not in tune with
the needs of other drivers. My assumption was that the wait queue data
structure was a reasonably generic way to handle something like this. Is
there a more appropriate/generic way of implementing a bottom half for
this purpose?

-John
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-12 21:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-12 19:38 [PATCH net-next] ibmvnic: Defer tx completion processing using a wait queue John Allen
2016-04-12 20:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-04-12 21:00   ` John Allen [this message]
2016-04-13  1:12     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=570D61E7.2090203@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).