From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 10:37:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <573AD836.4090006@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f99bce1-6fb7-b81d-26ca-24f1ca426c3e@redhat.com>
On 05/17/2016 10:35 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
> On 12/05/2016 16:23, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>
>> On 12/05/2016 11:27, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> On 05/12/2016 11:10 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>>> On 11/05/2016 13:49, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>> On 05/11/2016 01:14 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/05/2016 12:35, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>>>> On 03/15/2016 09:18 PM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>>>>>>> While writing some instruction tests for kvm-unit-tests for powerpc,
>>>>>>>> I've found that illegal instructions are not managed correctly with
>>>>>>>> kvm-pr,
>>>>>>>> while it is fine with kvm-hv.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When an illegal instruction (like ".long 0") is processed by kvm-pr,
>>>>>>>> the kernel logs are filled with:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Couldn't emulate instruction 0x00000000 (op 0 xop 0)
>>>>>>>> kvmppc_handle_exit_pr: emulation at 700 failed (00000000)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> While the exception handler receives an interrupt for each
>>>>>>>> instruction
>>>>>>>> executed after the illegal instruction.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c | 4 +++-
>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>>>>>>>> b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>>>>>>>> index 2afdb9c..4ee969d 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -99,7 +99,6 @@ int kvmppc_core_emulate_op_pr(struct kvm_run *run,
>>>>>>>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>>>>>>> switch (get_op(inst)) {
>>>>>>>> case 0:
>>>>>>>> - emulated = EMULATE_FAIL;
>>>>>>>> if ((kvmppc_get_msr(vcpu) & MSR_LE) &&
>>>>>>>> (inst == swab32(inst_sc))) {
>>>>>>>> /*
>>>>>>>> @@ -112,6 +111,9 @@ int kvmppc_core_emulate_op_pr(struct kvm_run
>>>>>>>> *run,
>>>>>>>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>>>>>>> kvmppc_set_gpr(vcpu, 3, EV_UNIMPLEMENTED);
>>>>>>>> kvmppc_set_pc(vcpu, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu) + 4);
>>>>>>>> emulated = EMULATE_DONE;
>>>>>>>> + } else {
>>>>>>>> + kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, SRR1_PROGILL);
>>>>>>> But isn't that exactly what the semantic of EMULATE_FAIL is? Fixing it
>>>>>>> up in book3s_emulate.c is definitely the wrong spot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So what is the problem you're trying to solve? Is the SRR0 at the
>>>>>>> wrong
>>>>>>> spot or are the log messages the problem?
>>>>>> No, the problem is the host kernel logs are filled by the message and
>>>>>> the execution hangs. And the host becomes unresponsiveness, even after
>>>>>> the end of the tests.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please, try to run kvm-unit-tests (the emulator test) on a KVM-PR host,
>>>>>> and check the kernel logs (dmesg), then try to ssh to the host...
>>>>> Ok, so the log messages are the problem. Please fix the message output
>>>>> then - or remove it altogether. Or if you like, create a module
>>>>> parameter that allows you to emit them.
>>>>>
>>>>> I personally think the best solution would be to just convert the
>>>>> message into a trace point.
>>>>>
>>>>> While at it, please see whether the guest can trigger similar host log
>>>>> output excess in other code paths.
>>>> The problem is not really with the log messages: they are consequence of
>>>> the bug I try to fix.
>>>>
>>>> What happens is once kvm_pr decodes an invalid instruction all the valid
>>>> following instructions trigger a Program exception to the guest (but are
>>>> executed correctly). It has no real consequence on big machine like
>>>> POWER8, except that the guest become very slow and the log files of the
>>>> host are filled with messages (and qemu uses 100% of the CPU). On a
>>>> smaller machine like a PowerMac G5, the machine becomes simply unusable.
>>> It's probably more related to your verbosity level of kernel messages.
>>> If you pass loglevel=0 (or quiet) to you kernel cmdline you won't get
>>> the messages printed to serial which is what's slowing you down.
>>>
>>> The other problem sounds pretty severe, but the only thing your patch
>>> does any different from the current code flow would be the patch below.
>>> Or did I miss anything?
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
>>> index 5cc2e7a..4672bc2 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/emulate.c
>>> @@ -302,7 +302,11 @@ int kvmppc_emulate_instruction(struct kvm_run *run,
>>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> advance = 0;
>>> printk(KERN_ERR "Couldn't emulate instruction
>>> 0x%08x "
>>> "(op %d xop %d)\n", inst, get_op(inst),
>>> get_xop(inst));
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S
>>> + kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, SRR1_PROGILL);
>>> +#else
>>> kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, 0);
>>> +#endif
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
> Do you want I send an updated patch with your changes?
Well, you reported the issue and narrowed it down, so feel free to send
it under your name :). I merely simplified your patch a bit.
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-17 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-15 20:18 [PATCH] kvm-pr: manage illegal instructions Laurent Vivier
2016-03-22 10:11 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-04-07 11:31 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-04-21 9:25 ` Thomas Huth
2016-05-09 8:14 ` Thomas Huth
2016-05-10 17:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-05-11 10:35 ` Alexander Graf
2016-05-11 11:14 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-05-11 11:49 ` Alexander Graf
2016-05-12 9:10 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-05-12 9:27 ` Alexander Graf
2016-05-12 14:23 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-05-17 8:35 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-05-17 8:37 ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2016-05-17 17:49 ` Laurent Vivier
2016-05-18 10:18 ` Thomas Huth
2016-05-18 10:53 ` Thomas Huth
2016-05-18 18:39 ` Thomas Huth
2016-05-19 7:11 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=573AD836.4090006@suse.de \
--to=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).