linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: powerpc/pseries: start rtasd before PCI probing
Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 20:23:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57434A97.90501@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <146399210850.26372.5857516772891352049.stgit@bahia.huguette.org>

On 23.05.2016 10:28, Greg Kurz wrote:
> A strange behaviour is observed when comparing PCI hotplug in QEMU, between
> x86 and pseries. If you consider the following steps:
> - start a VM
> - add a PCI device via the QEMU monitor before the rtasd has started (for
>   example starting the VM in paused state, or hotplug during FW or boot
>   loader)
> - resume the VM execution
> 
> The x86 kernel detects the PCI device, but the pseries one does not.
> 
> This happens because the rtasd kernel worker is currently started under
> device_initcall, while PCI probing happens earlier under subsys_initcall.
> 
> As a consequence, if we have a pending RTAS event at boot time, a message
> is printed and the event is dropped.
> 
> This patch moves all the initialization of rtasd to arch_initcall, which is
> run before subsys_call: this way, logging_enabled is true when the RTAS
> event pops up and it is not lost anymore.
> 
> The proc fs bits stay at device_initcall because they cannot be run before
> fs_initcall.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/rtasd.c |   19 ++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

By the way, same is true for device UNplugging: When unplugging devices
in QEMU while the firmware is still running, they are never properly
removed from the guest. I've checked it, and your patch fixes this
problem as well! Great :-)

Tested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-23 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-23  8:28 [PATCH] powerpc/pseries: start rtasd before PCI probing Greg Kurz
2016-05-23 18:23 ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2016-05-23 18:39   ` Greg Kurz
2016-05-30  7:37 ` [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH] " Greg Kurz
2016-06-10  5:18 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-06-10  6:41   ` Greg Kurz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57434A97.90501@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=gkurz@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).