From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3rZR8K2mtVzDq66 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 00:01:04 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u5MDxRpx046762 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:01:01 -0400 Received: from e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.111]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 23q795qr17-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:01:01 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp15.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:01:00 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CC81B0806E for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:02:09 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.248]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u5ME0vCg6095166 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 14:00:57 GMT Received: from d06av07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av07.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u5ME0ulb013567 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:00:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 16:02:33 +0200 From: Philippe Bergheaud MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Matthew R. Ochs" CC: Vaibhav Jain , mikey , manoj , linuxppc-dev , Ian Munsie Subject: Re: [v6, 1/2] cxl: Add mechanism for delivering AFU driver specific events References: <1466086415-30586-1-git-send-email-felix@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87k2hkgs6v.fsf@vajain21.in.ibm.com> <1466483778-sup-4320@x230.ozlabs.ibm.com> <87eg7qg79t.fsf@vajain21.in.ibm.com> <2686A514-2808-4F08-8514-5E08B5D3608A@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <2686A514-2808-4F08-8514-5E08B5D3608A@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Message-Id: <576A9A79.6050101@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Matthew R. Ochs wrote: >>On Jun 21, 2016, at 5:34 AM, Vaibhav Jain wrote: >> >>Hi Ian, >> >>Ian Munsie writes: >> >> >>>Excerpts from Vaibhav Jain's message of 2016-06-20 14:20:16 +0530: >>> >>>What exactly is the use case for this API? I'd vote to drop it if we can >>>do without it. >> >>Agree with this. Functionality of this API can be merged with >>cxl_set_driver_ops when called with NULL arg for cxl_afu_driver_ops. > > > Passing a NULL arg instead of calling an 'unset' API is fine with us. > > I'll add that for cxlflash, I can't envision a scenario where we'll unset the > driver ops for a context. > Agreed, thanks. I will drop API cxl_unset_driver_ops() in v7. Philippe