From: Shreyas B Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, anton@samba.org,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, bsingharora@gmail.com,
David.Laight@ACULAB.COM, arnd@arndb.de, nicolas.pitre@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Fix last_residency division
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 20:06:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57752E62.5030909@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467296844-2055-1-git-send-email-shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Please ignore this mail. I have resent this post using the correct
version number. Sorry for the noise.
On 06/30/2016 07:57 PM, Shreyas B. Prabhu wrote:
> Snooze is a poll idle state in powernv and pseries platforms. Snooze
> has a timeout so that if a cpu stays in snooze for more than target
> residency of the next available idle state, then it would exit thereby
> giving chance to the cpuidle governor to re-evaluate and
> promote the cpu to a deeper idle state. Therefore whenever snooze exits
> due to this timeout, its last_residency will be target_residency of next
> deeper state.
>
> commit e93e59ce5b85 ("cpuidle: Replace ktime_get() with local_clock()")
> changed the math around last_residency calculation. Specifically, while
> converting last_residency value from nanoseconds to microseconds it does
> right shift by 10. Due to this, in snooze timeout exit scenarios
> last_residency calculated is roughly 2.3% less than target_residency of
> next available state. This pattern is picked up get_typical_interval()
> in the menu governor and therefore expected_interval in menu_select() is
> frequently less than the target_residency of any state but snooze.
>
> Due to this we are entering snooze at a higher rate, thereby affecting
> the single thread performance.
>
> Fix this by using a better approximation for division by 1000.
>
> Reported-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
> Bisected-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Suggested-by David Laight <david.laight@aculab.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shreyas B. Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4
> =============
> - Increasing the threshold upto which approximation can be used.
> - Removed explicit cast. Instead added a comment saying why cast
> is safe.
>
> Changes in v3
> =============
> - Using approximation suggested by David
>
> Changes in v2
> =============
> - Fixing it in the cpuidle core code instead of driver code.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-30 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-30 14:27 [PATCH] cpuidle: Fix last_residency division Shreyas B. Prabhu
2016-06-30 14:36 ` Shreyas B Prabhu [this message]
2016-06-30 15:28 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57752E62.5030909@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).