From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3rgPBS6M8kzDrJC for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 01:50:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u5UFj8iw087731 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 11:50:06 -0400 Received: from e06smtp09.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp09.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.105]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 23vvccxkvu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 11:50:06 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp09.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 16:50:04 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay13.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.198]) by d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56AFC1B08067 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 16:51:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.212]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u5UFo1gH8388964 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 15:50:01 GMT Received: from d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u5UFo1N4008058 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2016 09:50:01 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cxl: Fix bug where AFU disable operation had no effect To: Ian Munsie References: <1467226286-28547-1-git-send-email-imunsie@au.ibm.com> <57752A8A.1020501@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1467298239-sup-4306@x230.ozlabs.ibm.com> Cc: mikey , linuxppc-dev , Huy Nguyen , Frederic Barrat From: Frederic Barrat Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 17:50:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1467298239-sup-4306@x230.ozlabs.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Message-Id: <57753FA8.1080306@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Le 30/06/2016 17:32, Ian Munsie a écrit : >> For dedicated mode, the CAIA recommends an explicit reset of the AFU >> >(section 2.1.1). > True, I had forgotten that procedure was added to the document before it > was made public - I'll update the comment and resend. > Actually, my point was that for dedicated mode, we shouldn't have the "if" and always reset. It's only for dedicated mode, so it wouldn't impact cx4 and we would stay CAIA-compliant. If one day, there's a xsl with a dedicated mode AFU, they are expected to follow the spec. Fred