From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from youngberry.canonical.com (youngberry.canonical.com [91.189.89.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3rgr2M4R2PzDql5 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 18:59:39 +1000 (AEST) Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the powerpc tree To: Stephen Rothwell , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org References: <20160701152707.444e03b4@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Colin Ian King Message-ID: <577630DB.9070401@canonical.com> Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 09:59:07 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160701152707.444e03b4@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 01/07/16 06:27, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the powerpc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > allyesconfig) failed like this: > > arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c: In function 'fadump_invalidate_dump': > arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c:1014:2: error: expected ';' before '}' token > } > ^ > > Caused by commit > > 4a03749f140c ("powerpc/fadump: Trivial fix of spelling mistake, clean up message") > > I have added this fix patch for today: > > From: Stephen Rothwell > Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 15:19:34 +1000 > Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/fadump: add missing semicolon > > Fixes: 4a03749f140c ("powerpc/fadump: Trivial fix of spelling mistake, clean up message") > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell > --- > arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c > index f0664860753e..b3a663333d36 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c > @@ -1010,7 +1010,7 @@ static int fadump_invalidate_dump(struct fadump_mem_struct *fdm) > > if (rc) { > pr_err("Failed to invalidate firmware-assisted dump registration. Unexpected error (%d).\n", rc); > - return rc > + return rc; > } > fw_dump.dump_active = 0; > fdm_active = NULL; > Apologies for that. Thanks for fixing it up.