From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3rl6Nt70QPzDr04 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 02:57:02 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.11/8.16.0.11) with SMTP id u66Gtj8F067073 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 12:57:00 -0400 Received: from e06smtp08.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp08.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.104]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2415xkg12q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 12:57:00 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp08.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 17:56:58 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FA8B17D8042 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 17:58:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.252]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u66Guuvl23920954 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 16:56:56 GMT Received: from d06av11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u66GusnE024804 for ; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 10:56:55 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] implement vcpu preempted check To: Peter Zijlstra , Juergen Gross References: <1467124991-13164-1-git-send-email-xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160706065255.GH30909@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <577CB786.8000902@suse.com> <20160706081920.GG30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Cc: Pan Xinhui , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, waiman.long@hpe.com, will.deacon@arm.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, dave@stgolabs.net, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org, Martin Schwidefsky From: Christian Borntraeger Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 18:56:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160706081920.GG30921@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Message-Id: <577D3854.6090407@de.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 07/06/2016 10:19 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 09:47:18AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: >> On 06/07/16 08:52, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >>> Paolo, could you help out with an (x86) KVM interface for this? >> >> Xen support of this interface should be rather easy. Could you please >> Cc: xen-devel-request@lists.xenproject.org in the next version? > > So meta question; aren't all you virt people looking at the regular > virtualization list? Or should we really dig out all the various > hypervisor lists and Cc them? > Some of the kvm on s390 team reads this, but I would assume that the base s390 team does not (Martin can you confirm?) as the main focus was z/VM and LPAR. So maybe adding linux-s390@vger for generic things does make sense.