linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>,
	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	markus@trippelsdorf.de, chris.ryder@arm.com,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Hemant Kumar <hemant@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/7] perf annotate: Add cross arch annotate support
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:56:35 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57BFEF2B.7080105@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160823153617.c0bb45eeefe993c554cb792a@arm.com>

Hi Kim,

I've tested your patch on x86 and powerpc and it looks fine to me. Can you please
put your signed-off-by.

Please add Act-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com> as well.

Regards,
-Ravi

On Wednesday 24 August 2016 02:06 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:17:16 +0900
> Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@arm.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 18:29:33 +0530
>>> Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Changes in v6:
>>>>   - Instead of adding only those instructions defined in #ifdef __arm__,
>>>>     add all instructions from default table to arm table.
>>> Thanks, I've gone through the list and removed all not-ARM
>>> instructions, and added some missing ARM branch instructions:
>> Can we use regex patterns instead?
> Yes, that helps prevent mistakes updating instruction lists - how does
> this look?:
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> index b2c6cf3..52316f3 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>  const char 	*disassembler_style;
>  const char	*objdump_path;
>  static regex_t	 file_lineno;
> +static regex_t	 arm_call_insn, arm_jump_insn;
>
>  static struct ins *ins__find(const char *name, const char *norm_arch);
>  static int disasm_line__parse(char *line, char **namep, char **rawp);
> @@ -449,98 +450,7 @@ static struct ins instructions_x86[] = {
>  	{ .name = "retq",  .ops  = &ret_ops, },
>  };
>
> -static struct ins instructions_arm[] = {
> -	{ .name = "add",   .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "addl",  .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "addq",  .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "addw",  .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "and",   .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "b",     .ops  = &jump_ops, }, /* might also be a call */
> -	{ .name = "bcc",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "bcs",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "beq",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "bge",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "bgt",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "bhi",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "bl",    .ops  = &call_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "bls",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "blt",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "blx",   .ops  = &call_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "bne",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "bts",   .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "call",  .ops  = &call_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "callq", .ops  = &call_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "cmp",   .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "cmpb",  .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "cmpl",  .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "cmpq",  .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "cmpw",  .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "cmpxch", .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "dec",   .ops  = &dec_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "decl",  .ops  = &dec_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "imul",  .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "inc",   .ops  = &dec_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "incl",  .ops  = &dec_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "ja",	   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jae",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jb",	   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jbe",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jc",	   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jcxz",  .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "je",	   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jecxz", .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jg",	   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jge",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jl",    .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jle",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jmp",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jmpq",  .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jna",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jnae",  .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jnb",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jnbe",  .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jnc",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jne",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jng",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jnge",  .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jnl",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jnle",  .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jno",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jnp",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jns",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jnz",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jo",	   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jp",	   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jpe",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jpo",   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jrcxz", .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "js",	   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "jz",	   .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "lea",   .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "lock",  .ops  = &lock_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "mov",   .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "movb",  .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "movdqa",.ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "movl",  .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "movq",  .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "movslq", .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "movzbl", .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "movzwl", .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "nop",   .ops  = &nop_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "nopl",  .ops  = &nop_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "nopw",  .ops  = &nop_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "or",    .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "orl",   .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "test",  .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "testb", .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "testl", .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "xadd",  .ops  = &mov_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "xbeginl", .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "xbeginq", .ops  = &jump_ops, },
> -	{ .name = "retq",  .ops  = &ret_ops, },
> -};
> -
> -struct instructions_powerpc {
> +struct instructions_arch {
>  	struct ins *ins;
>  	struct list_head list;
>  };
> @@ -560,41 +470,41 @@ static int ins__cmp(const void *a, const void *b)
>  	return strcmp(ia->name, ib->name);
>  }
>
> -static struct ins *list_add__ins_powerpc(struct instructions_powerpc *head,
> +static struct ins *list_add__ins_arch(struct instructions_arch *head,
>  					 const char *name, struct ins_ops *ops)
>  {
> -	struct instructions_powerpc *ins_powerpc;
> +	struct instructions_arch *ins_arch;
>  	struct ins *ins;
>
>  	ins = zalloc(sizeof(struct ins));
>  	if (!ins)
>  		return NULL;
>
> -	ins_powerpc = zalloc(sizeof(struct instructions_powerpc));
> -	if (!ins_powerpc)
> +	ins_arch = zalloc(sizeof(struct instructions_arch));
> +	if (!ins_arch)
>  		goto out_free_ins;
>
>  	ins->name = strdup(name);
>  	if (!ins->name)
> -		goto out_free_ins_power;
> +		goto out_free_ins_arch;
>
>  	ins->ops = ops;
> -	ins_powerpc->ins = ins;
> -	list_add_tail(&(ins_powerpc->list), &(head->list));
> +	ins_arch->ins = ins;
> +	list_add_tail(&(ins_arch->list), &(head->list));
>
>  	return ins;
>
> -out_free_ins_power:
> -	zfree(&ins_powerpc);
> +out_free_ins_arch:
> +	zfree(&ins_arch);
>  out_free_ins:
>  	zfree(&ins);
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>
> -static struct ins *list_search__ins_powerpc(struct instructions_powerpc *head,
> +static struct ins *list_search__ins_arch(struct instructions_arch *head,
>  					    const char *name)
>  {
> -	struct instructions_powerpc *pos;
> +	struct instructions_arch *pos;
>
>  	list_for_each_entry(pos, &head->list, list) {
>  		if (!strcmp(pos->ins->name, name))
> @@ -608,7 +518,7 @@ static struct ins *ins__find_powerpc(const char *name)
>  	int i;
>  	struct ins *ins;
>  	struct ins_ops *ops;
> -	static struct instructions_powerpc head;
> +	static struct instructions_arch head;
>  	static bool list_initialized;
>
>  	/*
> @@ -629,7 +539,7 @@ static struct ins *ins__find_powerpc(const char *name)
>  	/*
>  	 * Return if we already have object of 'struct ins' for this instruction
>  	 */
> -	ins = list_search__ins_powerpc(&head, name);
> +	ins = list_search__ins_arch(&head, name);
>  	if (ins)
>  		return ins;
>
> @@ -666,7 +576,44 @@ static struct ins *ins__find_powerpc(const char *name)
>  	 * Add instruction to list so next time no need to
>  	 * allocate memory for it.
>  	 */
> -	return list_add__ins_powerpc(&head, name, ops);
> +	return list_add__ins_arch(&head, name, ops);
> +}
> +
> +static struct ins *ins__find_arm(const char *name)
> +{
> +	struct ins *ins;
> +	struct ins_ops *ops = &mov_ops;
> +	static struct instructions_arch head;
> +	static bool list_initialized;
> +	regmatch_t match[2];
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!list_initialized) {
> +		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&head.list);
> +		list_initialized = true;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Return if we already have object of 'struct ins' for this instruction
> +	 */
> +	ins = list_search__ins_arch(&head, name);
> +	if (ins)
> +		return ins;
> +
> +	ret = regexec(&arm_call_insn, name, 2, match, 0);
> +	if (!ret) {
> +		ops = &call_ops;
> +	} else {
> +		ret = regexec(&arm_jump_insn, name, 2, match, 0);
> +		if (!ret)
> +			ops = &jump_ops;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Add instruction to list so next time no need to
> +	 * allocate memory for it.
> +	 */
> +	return list_add__ins_arch(&head, name, ops);
>  }
>
>  static void ins__sort(struct ins *instructions, int nmemb)
> @@ -686,15 +633,26 @@ static const char *annotate__norm_arch(char *arch)
>  	return normalize_arch(arch);
>  }
>
> +#define ARM_CONDS "(cc|cs|eq|ge|gt|hi|le|ls|lt|mi|ne|pl|vc|vs)"
> +
>  static struct ins *ins__find(const char *name, const char *norm_arch)
>  {
>  	static bool sorted;
>  	struct ins *instructions;
> -	int nmemb;
> +	int nmemb, ret;
>
>  	if (!sorted) {
>  		ins__sort(instructions_x86, ARRAY_SIZE(instructions_x86));
> -		ins__sort(instructions_arm, ARRAY_SIZE(instructions_arm));
> +		if (!strcmp(norm_arch, NORM_ARM)) {
> +			ret = regcomp(&arm_call_insn,
> +				      "^blx?" ARM_CONDS "?$", REG_EXTENDED);
> +			ret |= regcomp(&arm_jump_insn,
> +				       "^bx?" ARM_CONDS "?$", REG_EXTENDED);
> +			if (ret) {
> +				pr_err("regcomp failed\n");
> +				return NULL;
> +			}
> +		}
>  		sorted = true;
>  	}
>
> @@ -702,8 +660,7 @@ static struct ins *ins__find(const char *name, const char *norm_arch)
>  		instructions = instructions_x86;
>  		nmemb = ARRAY_SIZE(instructions_x86);
>  	} else if (!strcmp(norm_arch, NORM_ARM)) {
> -		instructions = instructions_arm;
> -		nmemb = ARRAY_SIZE(instructions_arm);
> +		return ins__find_arm(name);
>  	} else if (!strcmp(norm_arch, NORM_POWERPC)) {
>  		return ins__find_powerpc(name);
>  	} else {
>
> Note that, for ARM, in order to match return instructions, 'lr' must be
> found to be the operand of the branch instruction, which is not
> contained in the 'name' variable passed to ins__find().
>
> Kim
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-26  7:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-19 12:59 [PATCH v6 0/7] perf: Cross arch annotate + few miscellaneous fixes Ravi Bangoria
2016-08-19 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] perf: Define macro for normalized arch names Ravi Bangoria
2016-08-19 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] perf annotate: Add cross arch annotate support Ravi Bangoria
2016-08-22 23:01   ` Kim Phillips
2016-08-23  2:17     ` Namhyung Kim
2016-08-23 20:36       ` Kim Phillips
2016-08-26  6:21         ` Namhyung Kim
2016-08-26  7:26         ` Ravi Bangoria [this message]
2016-08-27  0:40           ` [PATCH] perf annotate: cross arch annotate support fixes for ARM Kim Phillips
2016-08-19 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] perf annotate: Add support for powerpc Ravi Bangoria
2016-09-19 15:26   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-08-19 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] perf annotate: Do not ignore call instruction with indirect target Ravi Bangoria
2016-09-19 15:44   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-09-20 14:35     ` Ravi Bangoria
2016-09-20 14:56       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-08-19 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] perf annotate: Show raw form for jump " Ravi Bangoria
2016-08-19 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] perf annotate: Support jump instruction with target as second operand Ravi Bangoria
2016-08-19 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] perf annotate: Fix jump target outside of function address range Ravi Bangoria
2016-09-07 15:39 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] perf: Cross arch annotate + few miscellaneous fixes Ravi Bangoria

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57BFEF2B.7080105@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris.ryder@arm.com \
    --cc=hemant@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kim.phillips@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=markus@trippelsdorf.de \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=treeze.taeung@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).