From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3t8Yjs65FjzDsxc for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:41:21 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id uA35dlGp029618 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 01:41:19 -0400 Received: from e17.ny.us.ibm.com (e17.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.207]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 26fnf6efbm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 03 Nov 2016 01:41:19 -0400 Received: from localhost by e17.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 01:41:18 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: Emulation support for load/store instructions on LE To: Anton Blanchard References: <1478076783-2872-1-git-send-email-ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1478076783-2872-2-git-send-email-ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20161103080412.68240cda@kryten> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, duwe@lst.de, ast@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, chris@distroguy.com, oss@buserror.net, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, oohall@gmail.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca, bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Ravi Bangoria From: Ravi Bangoria Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 11:11:06 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161103080412.68240cda@kryten> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Message-Id: <581ACDF2.1010409@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thursday 03 November 2016 02:34 AM, Anton Blanchard wrote: > Hi Ravi, > >> emulate_step() uses a number of underlying kernel functions that were >> initially not enabled for LE. This has been rectified since. So, fix >> emulate_step() for LE for the corresponding instructions. > Thanks. Should this be queued up for stable? Thanks Anton. Yes, this should go in stable. -Ravi