linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: yjin <yanjiang.jin@windriver.com>
To: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>, <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	<paulus@samba.org>, <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<jinyanjiang@gmail.com>, <yanjiang.jin@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: cputime: fix a compile warning
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 13:04:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <583FAF71.7070708@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480516844.21746.66.camel@buserror.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1467 bytes --]

Hi Scott,

Thanks for your reminder!
I rephrased it as below:

-#define cputime64_to_clock_t(ct) cputime_to_clock_t((cputime_t)(ct))
+#define cputime64_to_clock_t(ct)       \
+       (u64)(cputime_to_clock_t((cputime_t)(ct)))


and rebuilt the kernel, no warnings found.
New patch is attached, could you also help me to review it?

Regards!
Yanjiang

On 2016年11月30日 22:40, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 12:56 +0800, yanjiang.jin@windriver.com wrote:
>> From: Yanjiang Jin <yanjiang.jin@windriver.com>
>>
>> This patch is to avoid the below warning:
>>
>> kernel/sched/cpuacct.c:298:25: warning:
>> format '%lld' expects argument of type 'long long int',
>> but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int' [-Wformat=]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yanjiang Jin <yanjiang.jin@windriver.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputime.h | 3 ++-
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputime.h
>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputime.h
>> index 4f60db0..4423e97 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputime.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputime.h
>> @@ -228,7 +228,8 @@ static inline cputime_t clock_t_to_cputime(const
>> unsigned long clk)
>>   	return (__force cputime_t) ct;
>>   }
>>   
>> -#define cputime64_to_clock_t(ct)	cputime_to_clock_t((cputime_t)(ct))
>> +#define cputime64_to_clock_t(ct)	\
>> +	(__force u64)(cputime_to_clock_t((cputime_t)(ct)))
> Why is __force needed?
>
> -Scott
>


[-- Attachment #2: 0001-powerpc-cputime-fix-a-compile-warning.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1137 bytes --]

>From c32bc6ffe070e3d79a420e6adcbed5709079dc23 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yanjiang Jin <yanjiang.jin@windriver.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 05:04:53 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc: cputime: fix a compile warning

This patch is to avoid the below warning:

kernel/sched/cpuacct.c:298:25: warning:
format '%lld' expects argument of type 'long long int',
but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int' [-Wformat=]

Signed-off-by: Yanjiang Jin <yanjiang.jin@windriver.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputime.h | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputime.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputime.h
index 4f60db0..a25082b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputime.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputime.h
@@ -228,7 +228,8 @@ static inline cputime_t clock_t_to_cputime(const unsigned long clk)
 	return (__force cputime_t) ct;
 }
 
-#define cputime64_to_clock_t(ct)	cputime_to_clock_t((cputime_t)(ct))
+#define cputime64_to_clock_t(ct)	\
+	(u64)(cputime_to_clock_t((cputime_t)(ct)))
 
 /*
  * PPC64 uses PACA which is task independent for storing accounting data while
-- 
1.9.1


  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-01  5:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-21  4:56 [PATCH] powerpc: cputime: fix a compile warning yanjiang.jin
2016-11-30 14:40 ` Scott Wood
2016-12-01  5:04   ` yjin [this message]
2016-12-02  4:15 ` Michael Ellerman
2016-12-02  4:22   ` Balbir Singh
2016-12-02  4:35     ` yjin
2016-12-02  5:15       ` Pan Xinhui
2016-12-02  5:17         ` yjin
2016-12-02 19:54   ` Scott Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=583FAF71.7070708@windriver.com \
    --to=yanjiang.jin@windriver.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=jinyanjiang@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=oss@buserror.net \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).