From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3vyWcV6VJyzDq5W for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 13:32:26 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v353TCdN044354 for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 23:32:19 -0400 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com (e36.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.154]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 29ktf88mfn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 23:32:19 -0400 Received: from localhost by e36.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 21:32:18 -0600 Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 20:32:05 -0700 From: Haren Myneni MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Ellerman CC: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, ddstreet@ieee.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, mikey@neuling.org, suka@us.ibm.com, hbabu@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] crypto/nx: Rename nx842_powernv_function as icswx function References: <1491065941.29552.26.camel@hbabu-laptop> <87inmkv348.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> In-Reply-To: <87inmkv348.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Message-Id: <58E46535.5080108@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 04/04/2017 04:11 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Haren Myneni writes: > >> [PATCH 1/5] crypto/nx: Rename nx842_powernv_function as icswx function >> >> nx842_powernv_function is points to nx842_icswx_function and >> will be point to VAS function which will be added later for >> P9 NX support. > > I know it's nit-picking but can you give it a better name while you're > there. > > I was thinking it should be called "send" or something, but it actually > synchronously sends and waits for a request. > > So perhaps just nx842_exec(), for "execute a request", and then you can > have nx842_exec_icswx() and nx842_exec_vas(). > > cheers > Michael, Thanks for review, nx842_powernv_function() was used before, So just renamed similar to this name. But I will make changes in the next version. Haren