From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A489DC433E0 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 21:42:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E14564EE1 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 21:42:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1E14564EE1 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DbYBs37bLzDwl4 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:42:29 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=zohar@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=fLVuTXw5; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DbY8f5Bn3zDvbh for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:40:34 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 11ALWRbh160883; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:40:09 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : subject : from : to : cc : date : in-reply-to : references : content-type : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=o6TuZSQpcdPy3WLJuSm6eQE5aim7yVvdU9t1MZ9OKtY=; b=fLVuTXw5GB0xrlUk9+oUdcgS4Vi41lMR5mxO36IQgNnpvqXZUxXWqWGdeA0m5zvj2Scq +udTAdoJOtISM3SBU9htGICE/uGZMMeAza8AluFqtfMB6Z1KD/2lqwHIVs/Ldt0qVzQy 6T0qn1V/WUUPT1gqzHKvo8/YQhXm2vVLM1YokVqNYWHUXOT/Doel3iHglMPxEzVmPj1v dlLbS2J5sBWqKNlYfhgyBlE8ZY/Ucl8amu08c55zvJ2oiy8PqOPxyXi8g4lPez/Dj9Y3 os136pOS/Ct+2LPLeGZYnITaB4OQe5LhdP9VRAmEznVx/zQM+omj1OKehdCf+VMC9oD6 Jw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36mqff0b67-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:40:08 -0500 Received: from m0098416.ppops.net (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 11ALWXwH161540; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:40:07 -0500 Received: from ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (6b.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.107]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36mqff0b4r-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:40:07 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma03fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 11ALQwK2018691; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 21:40:05 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.196]) by ppma03fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 36hskb2jk4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 21:40:05 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 11ALe2Oq42926414 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 21:40:03 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CECA211C05E; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 21:40:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C2111C04A; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 21:39:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-f45666cc-3089-11b2-a85c-c57d1a57929f.ibm.com (unknown [9.160.111.148]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 21:39:56 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <594445d01e085875b97b46be726247f89d1e6661.camel@linux.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 00/10] Carry forward IMA measurement log on kexec on ARM64 From: Mimi Zohar To: Rob Herring , Lakshmi Ramasubramanian Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:39:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <20210209182200.30606-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com> <20210210171500.GA2328209@robh.at.kernel.org> <5c002c32-bc49-acda-c641-7b1494ea292d@linux.microsoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-14.el8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.737 definitions=2021-02-10_10:2021-02-10, 2021-02-10 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102100186 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , tao.li@vivo.com, Paul Mackerras , vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, Frank Rowand , Sasha Levin , Masahiro Yamada , James Morris , "AKASHI, Takahiro" , linux-arm-kernel , Catalin Marinas , "Serge E. Hallyn" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Tatashin , Will Deacon , Prakhar Srivastava , Hsin-Yi Wang , Allison Randal , Christophe Leroy , Matthias Brugger , balajib@linux.microsoft.com, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , James Morse , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Joe Perches , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev , Thiago Jung Bauermann Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 15:55 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote: > On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 14:42 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:33 AM Lakshmi Ramasubramanian > > > Ideally, we don't apply the same patch in 2 branches. It looks like > > there's a conflict but no real dependence on the above patch (the > > ima_buffer part). The conflict seems trivial enough that Linus can > > resolve it in the merge window. > > > > Or Mimi can take the whole thing if preferred? > > How about I create a topic branch with just the two patches, allowing > both of us to merge it? There shouldn't be a problem with re-writing > next-integrity history. The 2 patches are now in the ima-kexec-fixes branch. Mimi