From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from EUR02-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr20089.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.2.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40l1z35dRCzF38W for ; Mon, 14 May 2018 23:39:56 +1000 (AEST) From: Laurentiu Tudor To: Nipun Gupta , "robin.murphy@arm.com" , "will.deacon@arm.com" , "mark.rutland@arm.com" , "catalin.marinas@arm.com" CC: "hch@lst.de" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "joro@8bytes.org" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "m.szyprowski@samsung.com" , "shawnguo@kernel.org" , "frowand.list@gmail.com" , "bhelgaas@google.com" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Bharat Bhushan , "stuyoder@gmail.com" , Leo Li Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6 v3] bus: fsl-mc: supoprt dma configure for devices on fsl-mc bus Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 13:39:50 +0000 Message-ID: <5AF9916E.8000504@nxp.com> References: <1524824826-29473-1-git-send-email-nipun.gupta@nxp.com> <1524824826-29473-6-git-send-email-nipun.gupta@nxp.com> In-Reply-To: <1524824826-29473-6-git-send-email-nipun.gupta@nxp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Nipun, On 04/27/2018 01:27 PM, Nipun Gupta wrote: > Signed-off-by: Nipun Gupta > --- > drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c b/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-= bus.c > index 5d8266c..624828b 100644 > --- a/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c > +++ b/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c > @@ -127,6 +127,16 @@ static int fsl_mc_bus_uevent(struct device *dev, str= uct kobj_uevent_env *env) > return 0; > } > > +static int fsl_mc_dma_configure(struct device *dev) > +{ > + struct device *dma_dev =3D dev; > + > + while (dev_is_fsl_mc(dma_dev)) > + dma_dev =3D dma_dev->parent; > + > + return of_dma_configure(dev, dma_dev->of_node, 0); > +} > + > static ssize_t modalias_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribut= e *attr, > char *buf) > { > @@ -148,6 +158,7 @@ struct bus_type fsl_mc_bus_type =3D { > .name =3D "fsl-mc", > .match =3D fsl_mc_bus_match, > .uevent =3D fsl_mc_bus_uevent, > + .dma_configure =3D fsl_mc_dma_configure, > .dev_groups =3D fsl_mc_dev_groups, > }; > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fsl_mc_bus_type); > @@ -616,6 +627,7 @@ int fsl_mc_device_add(struct fsl_mc_obj_desc *obj_des= c, > mc_dev->icid =3D parent_mc_dev->icid; > mc_dev->dma_mask =3D FSL_MC_DEFAULT_DMA_MASK; > mc_dev->dev.dma_mask =3D &mc_dev->dma_mask; > + mc_dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask =3D mc_dev->dma_mask; This change seems a bit unrelated to the patch subject. I wonder if it=20 makes sense to split it it in a distinct patch. --- Best Regards, Laurentiu=