From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429CDC43219 for ; Sat, 4 May 2019 08:46:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (unknown [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DD0C206DF for ; Sat, 4 May 2019 08:46:24 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7DD0C206DF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44x2fQ0KG1zDqWQ for ; Sat, 4 May 2019 18:46:22 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com (client-ip=45.249.212.190; helo=huawei.com; envelope-from=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Received: from huawei.com (szxga04-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.190]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44x2ck0lRvzDqVK for ; Sat, 4 May 2019 18:44:52 +1000 (AEST) Received: from DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id EAB0F5D52CC2EA261151; Sat, 4 May 2019 16:44:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.177.23.164) by DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Sat, 4 May 2019 16:44:39 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/1] iommu: enhance IOMMU dma mode build options To: Jean-Philippe Brucker , John Garry , Robin Murphy , Will Deacon , Joerg Roedel , Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc , Sebastian Ott , Gerald Schaefer , "Martin Schwidefsky" , Heiko Carstens , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , "Michael Ellerman" , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H . Peter Anvin" , David Woodhouse , iommu , linux-kernel , linux-s390 , linuxppc-dev , x86 , linux-ia64 References: <20190418135701.24668-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" Message-ID: <5CCD50E7.3070505@huawei.com> Date: Sat, 4 May 2019 16:44:23 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190418135701.24668-1-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.23.164] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Hanjun Guo Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Hi all, Can anybody review or comment? On 2019/4/18 21:57, Zhen Lei wrote: > v5 --> v6: > 1. give up adding boot option iommu.dma_mode > > v4 --> v5: > As Hanjun and Thomas Gleixner's suggestion: > 1. Keep the old ARCH specific boot options no change. > 2. Keep build option CONFIG_IOMMU_DEFAULT_PASSTHROUGH no change. > > v4: > As Robin Murphy's suggestion: > "It's also not necessarily obvious to the user how this interacts with > IOMMU_DEFAULT_PASSTHROUGH, so if we really do go down this route, maybe it > would be better to refactor the whole lot into a single selection of something > like IOMMU_DEFAULT_MODE anyway." > > In this version, I tried to normalize the IOMMU dma mode boot options for all > ARCHs. When IOMMU is enabled, there are 3 dma modes: paasthrough(bypass), > lazy(mapping but defer the IOTLB invalidation), strict. But currently each > ARCHs defined their private boot options, different with each other. For > example, to enable/disable "passthrough", ARM64 use iommu.passthrough=1/0, > X86 use iommu=pt/nopt, PPC/POWERNV use iommu=nobypass. > > Zhen Lei (1): > iommu: enhance IOMMU dma mode build options > > arch/ia64/kernel/pci-dma.c | 2 +- > arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 3 ++- > arch/s390/pci/pci_dma.c | 2 +- > arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c | 7 ++--- > drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > drivers/iommu/amd_iommu_init.c | 3 ++- > drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 2 +- > drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 3 ++- > 8 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > -- Thanks! BestRegards