From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AC8EB70B8 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2010 02:18:22 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1286266201.2463.336.camel@pasglop> References: <63799.84.105.60.153.1286166325.squirrel@gate.crashing.org> <1286266201.2463.336.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <5EE72F00-BC7C-426B-A828-FE21CC868982@kernel.crashing.org> From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: use of BAT before taking over the MMU Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 17:22:35 +0200 To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Albert Cahalan , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >> The PowerPC OF binding requires the firmware to save and restore >> the BATs on entry to / exit from the firmware. > > I'm not sure he was talking about OF here... Yeah, I thought I was on a different mailing list. It's still sort-of relevant though. > In any case, we don't muck > around with BATs until after we're done with OF anyways. "Lower than the lowest common divider", yeah ;-) Segher