From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2263C433B4 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED2F76144E for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:15:02 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ED2F76144E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FQMyF14vTz30Gg for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:15:01 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=Htq4AavT; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::731; helo=mail-qk1-x731.google.com; envelope-from=leobras.c@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=Htq4AavT; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-qk1-x731.google.com (mail-qk1-x731.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::731]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQMxm0kT4z2y6C for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:14:33 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qk1-x731.google.com with SMTP id v7so14830515qkj.13 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:14:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :organization:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=H0xUL+VFdyIa0ji4Th/5YMGTFHYr1jkOK9wBOItrp/Y=; b=Htq4AavTUvaIKjrSwYSgfk/9LOhsOQRau62GNNkBD79Sh4VxHePzD2L+B52RENCsHI 4PL+nqqx70rsT6DneonIWLk2JgIAAKH4RYpwmo9Wn4GDqdmpAlfpjtk7jRllYJmXZiyo tnWbbNT+p3igXVTAx/jBF1NGPsOxeu1AmVb87QTHjEKTdSc2O7Jo3LKCuXXR0KpW4+Bg RW9awX3klxF+hBslxw/CUl5QEoKtY33EQ/HmP0wx4EJ0xHnjRpqiBjFbzcGxBnN5SQYr KgFfi77SLsFAOdNhi6+68ezGqnlxjq1tZBqUtfj/RhDFkEwEa14TQvGCRvorbKiVdznv Pi9A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:organization:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=H0xUL+VFdyIa0ji4Th/5YMGTFHYr1jkOK9wBOItrp/Y=; b=hXBqCKXBQ59KRCUOwd1cVeQWqF5G9Uvgmzhg9hNSnyczn0FVu3PCq5qcyyN4FtJGgb fjir7x2MjmBG5V7DMUQTRnSjy0aYhjWOaYXSwzQb5vLRRcO8WOwqAKMNmDtJrZlZmDbG lyyqjC1GI6QYjyy1R3vXt6/gdV3iQoimiXwOJdBhim4uU3OBqAJqWjbqHpM4fE/Lq5pP XuJLiCtXt8uhkjsFxhBIANxLqKxFR9NlDGQrNBywKk+dVdg9hocJlO/Mtlba/q85Nv5q cQzF56OhMZDq6ldvLGgEEEKyKjLYawlHwb8auNNRsXH48n+1yrkW+L/equiGARWLW3dZ 8E5A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531eOyN1cno0Ib4PK3F1SrzaXlwmbFw8DpHfjNxsNDFbfd2n3tZX TB6aM3lLn3Qt9JykbdN1JaA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw8CLguVFAPzF8l1/1q5ENNtjHkvPtfqw/PekYFKdTDnJWRL0D+IoF3dUIZdep6LDU4L/VqjQ== X-Received: by 2002:a37:a5d6:: with SMTP id o205mr11119679qke.166.1619014469882; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:14:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from li-908e0a4c-2250-11b2-a85c-f027e903211b.ibm.com ([177.35.200.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o12sm2150348qkg.36.2021.04.21.07.14.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:14:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5da23b1199c897b464c7bf7027ac50057d1cb5b6.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] of/pci: Add IORESOURCE_MEM_64 to resource flags for 64-bit memory addresses From: Leonardo Bras To: Rob Herring Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 11:14:25 -0300 In-Reply-To: References: <20210415180050.373791-1-leobras.c@gmail.com> <7b089cd48b90f2445c7cb80da1ce8638607c46fc.camel@gmail.com> Organization: IBM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.4 (3.38.4-1.fc33) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Kardashevskiy , Frank Rowand , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , PCI , linuxppc-dev Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, 2021-04-20 at 17:34 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > [...] > > I think the point here is bus resources not getting the MEM_64 flag, > > but device resources getting it correctly. Is that supposed to happen? > > I experimented with this on Arm with qemu and it seems fine there too. > Looks like the BARs are first read and will have bit 2 set by default > (or hardwired?). Now I'm just wondering why powerpc needs the code it > has... > > Anyways, I'll apply the patch. > > Rob Thanks Rob!