From: Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial/pmac_zilog: Remove flawed mitigation for rx irq flood
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 09:17:27 +1100 (AEDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5dd285bd-b9a8-c85c-9bd9-a839c10e78fd@linux-m68k.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VcxLez_Nm0N8=gpWd7SKGd9JF2QXEOOB_gvX3ZtTzj6HQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> > > > ---
> > > (here is a good location for Cc:)
> >
> > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst indicats that it should
> > be above the "---" separator together with Acked-by etc. Has this
> > convention changed recently?
>
> I see, I will prepare a patch to discuss this aspect.
>
If you are going to veto patches on the basis of rules yet unwritten, I
think you risk turning the kernel development process into a lottery.
How many other patches presently under review will need to be dropped just
in case they don't conform with possible future rules?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-04 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-28 4:11 [PATCH] serial/pmac_zilog: Remove flawed mitigation for rx irq flood Finn Thain
2024-04-03 22:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-03 23:59 ` Finn Thain
2024-04-04 9:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-04 22:17 ` Finn Thain [this message]
2024-04-05 5:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-05 3:06 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-04-05 3:46 ` Finn Thain
2024-04-08 5:29 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-04-08 5:32 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-04-08 5:37 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-04-08 5:44 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-04-08 8:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-04-05 5:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-04 5:07 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-04-04 9:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5dd285bd-b9a8-c85c-9bd9-a839c10e78fd@linux-m68k.org \
--to=fthain@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox