From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: <srikar@linux.ibm.com>, <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>,
<maddy@linux.ibm.com>, <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>,
<chleroy@kernel.org>, <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
<peterz@infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>, <linux-sched@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] sched/cache: "Make LLC id continuous" causes NULL cpumask
Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 22:00:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e292187-35f1-4ba0-b146-8b1f2fb7f0cd@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d45877d5-86f1-4581-b3e0-59ceb722de3a@linux.ibm.com>
Hello Shrikanth,
On 5/27/2026 12:31 PM, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> Hi Chen, Prateek.
>
> I got back to work today, sorry for delay.
> I am trying to go through the mails.
> Apologies in case i have missed any bits.
>
> On 5/26/26 7:38 PM, Chen Yu wrote:
>> Hi Prateek,
>>
>> On Tue, 26 May 2026 11:23:59 +0530, K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> wrote:
>>> Hello Srikar,
>>>
>>> On 5/26/2026 10:28 AM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>>>> L2 Cache reported here is for SMT8 Core aka CACHE domain.
>>>
>>> Apart for the scheduler, nothing in tree currently cares about
>>> cpu_coregroup_mask() except for drivers/base/arch_topology.c but
>>> Power doesn't select GENERIC_ARCH_TOPOLOGY.
>>>
>>> Why can't Power have an internal mask for MC domain (tl_mc_mask) and
>>> the scheduler can use cpu_coregroup_mask() for the actual LLc? (The L2
>>> mask in this case.)
>
> This seems wrong. there is no notion that coregroup_mask
> (MC domain) has to point at LLC domain.
It seems that only PowerPC is special at that. Only 3 architectures
override the default topology via set_sched_topology() - x86, and
s390 both still have SD_SHARE_LLC set for their MC domain, as is the
case with default_topology[] in topology.c with cpu_core_flags().
> For example, on Shared LPAR, there is no MC domain and LLC is at SMT core level.
> In that case coregroup_mask has point at SMT mask is wrong.
That is equivalent of MC degenerating onto the core domain right?
cpu_coregroup_mask() pointing to a core shouldn't be problematic
in that case.
> If we need a mask to point to the LLC mask which arch has to return, then we would
> need a new api say cpu_llc_mask ? that can point accordingly.
>
> I don't like mixing MC domain and LLC into one bit.
The SCHED_CACHE bits assume cpu_coregroup_mask() points to the sd_llc
domain and uses the sched_cpu_activate() path to assign the llc_id
independent of partitions and sched domain bits.
That assumption holds true for everything except powerpc. Is there
anything aside from the scheduler bits that use the
cpu_coregroup_mask()? We can always keep a big fat comment on top that
reads it points to the sd_llc domain and it may not be the MC domain
on power.
>> I suppose what you suggested looks like below:
Hello Chenyu! Yes, this was pretty much what I had in mind! Thank you
for the patch.
>>
>> powerpc/smp: make cpu_coregroup_mask() return the LLC
>>
>> On pSeries shared LPARs(or coregroup_enabled is false on
>> Power9 and earlier) the hemisphere map is not allocated, so
>> build_sched_domains() dereferences a NULL cpumask and crashes.
>>
>> The generic scheduler expects cpu_coregroup_mask() to span the LLC.
>> On powerpc the LLC is the L2. Return cpu_l2_cache_mask() instead of
>> the hemisphere map. Use a coregroup_map() helper for the in-file
>> hemisphere users, and a powerpc_tl_mc_mask() wrapper for the MC
>> sched-domain level.
>>
>> Fixes: b5ea300a17e3 ("sched/cache: Make LLC id continuous")
>> Reported-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
>> Suggested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -1040,11 +1040,22 @@ static const struct cpumask *tl_smallcore_smt_mask(struct sched_domain_topology_
>> }
>> #endif
>> +static inline struct cpumask *coregroup_map(int cpu)
>> +{
>> + return per_cpu(cpu_coregroup_map, cpu);
>> +}
>> +
>> struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu)
>> {
>> - return per_cpu(cpu_coregroup_map, cpu);
>> + return cpu_l2_cache_mask(cpu);
>> +}
>
> This looks wrong to me too. In different hardware topologies
> there maybe distinction between coregroup and l2 mask.
>
> Let me go through the code and see if there is better way.
The other option was to add an arch_llc_mask macro that can be
optionally defined on the arch/ side if the cpu_coregroup_mask()
doesn't point to the LLC
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8d14c844-b4a8-4af6-acab-2cfdd42225be@intel.com/
--
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-27 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-25 14:07 [BUG] sched/cache: "Make LLC id continuous" causes NULL cpumask dereference in build_sched_domains on POWER9 Venkat Rao Bagalkote
2026-05-25 15:35 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-25 16:16 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-26 3:14 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-26 3:14 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-26 4:08 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-26 4:58 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-26 5:53 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-26 14:08 ` [BUG] sched/cache: "Make LLC id continuous" causes NULL cpumask Chen Yu
2026-05-27 7:01 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-27 16:05 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-27 18:07 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 4:58 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 9:12 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-28 10:26 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 15:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-28 15:58 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-27 16:30 ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2026-05-26 5:24 ` [BUG] sched/cache: "Make LLC id continuous" causes NULL cpumask dereference in build_sched_domains on POWER9 Venkat Rao Bagalkote
2026-05-27 7:05 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 16:01 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-28 6:54 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-05-28 16:06 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-28 11:27 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 13:21 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-28 15:06 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-05-28 15:56 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-28 16:31 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 16:44 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-29 3:58 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-29 6:59 ` Venkat Rao Bagalkote
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5e292187-35f1-4ba0-b146-8b1f2fb7f0cd@amd.com \
--to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sched@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox