From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de,
Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>,
Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>, Mete Durlu <meted@linux.ibm.com>,
Tobias Huschle <huschle@linux.ibm.com>,
Easwar Hariharan <easwar.hariharan@linux.microsoft.com>,
Guo Weikang <guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Patryk Wlazlyn <patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com>,
Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>,
"Yury Norov [NVIDIA]" <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] sched/fair: Get rid of sched_domains_curr_level hack for tl->cpumask()
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 14:23:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ec9ca8a-9ba9-4600-a7a2-f7bd790fca83@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xhsmh7bymlg2f.mognet@vschneid-thinkpadt14sgen2i.remote.csb>
On 8/29/25 1:23 PM, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 26/08/25 12:13, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> Subject: sched/fair: Get rid of sched_domains_curr_level hack for tl->cpumask()
>> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 12:02:44 +0000
>>
>> Leon [1] and Vinicius [2] noted a topology_span_sane() warning during
>> their testing starting from v6.16-rc1. Debug that followed pointed to
>> the tl->mask() for the NODE domain being incorrectly resolved to that of
>> the highest NUMA domain.
>>
>> tl->mask() for NODE is set to the sd_numa_mask() which depends on the
>> global "sched_domains_curr_level" hack. "sched_domains_curr_level" is
>> set to the "tl->numa_level" during tl traversal in build_sched_domains()
>> calling sd_init() but was not reset before topology_span_sane().
>>
>> Since "tl->numa_level" still reflected the old value from
>> build_sched_domains(), topology_span_sane() for the NODE domain trips
>> when the span of the last NUMA domain overlaps.
>>
>> Instead of replicating the "sched_domains_curr_level" hack, get rid of
>> it entirely and instead, pass the entire "sched_domain_topology_level"
>> object to tl->cpumask() function to prevent such mishap in the future.
>>
>> sd_numa_mask() now directly references "tl->numa_level" instead of
>> relying on the global "sched_domains_curr_level" hack to index into
>> sched_domains_numa_masks[].
>>
>
> Eh, of course I see this *after* looking at the v6 patch.
>
> I tested this again for good measure, but given I only test this under
> x86 and the changes with v6 are in s390/ppc, I didn't expect to see much
> change :-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
>
I was looking at: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git/log/?h=sched/core
Current code doesn't allow one to enable/disable SCHED_MC on ppc since it is set always in kconfig.
Used the below patch:
I think since the config is there, it would be good to provide a option to disable. no?
---
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
index fc0d1c19f5a1..da5b2f8d3686 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
@@ -170,9 +170,8 @@ config PPC
select ARCH_STACKWALK
select ARCH_SUPPORTS_ATOMIC_RMW
select ARCH_SUPPORTS_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC if PPC_BOOK3S || PPC_8xx
- select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_SMT if PPC64 && SMP
select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_MC if PPC64 && SMP
- select SCHED_MC if ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_MC
+ select ARCH_SUPPORTS_SCHED_SMT if PPC64 && SMP
select ARCH_USE_BUILTIN_BSWAP
select ARCH_USE_CMPXCHG_LOCKREF if PPC64
select ARCH_USE_MEMTEST
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
index 68edb66c2964..458ec5bd859e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -1706,10 +1706,12 @@ static void __init build_sched_topology(void)
SDTL_INIT(tl_cache_mask, powerpc_shared_cache_flags, CACHE);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MC
if (has_coregroup_support()) {
powerpc_topology[i++] =
SDTL_INIT(tl_mc_mask, powerpc_shared_proc_flags, MC);
}
+#endif
powerpc_topology[i++] = SDTL_INIT(tl_pkg_mask, powerpc_shared_proc_flags, PKG);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-29 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-26 4:13 [PATCH v7 0/8] sched/fair: Get rid of sched_domains_curr_level hack for tl->cpumask() K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] " K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-28 23:06 ` Tim Chen
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] powerpc/smp: Rename cpu_corgroup_* to cpu_corgrp_* K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 5:02 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-09-01 3:05 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] powerpc/smp: Export cpu_coregroup_mask() K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 4:54 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] powerpc/smp: Introduce CONFIG_SCHED_MC to guard MC scheduling bits K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 4:49 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-26 8:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-26 9:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-26 9:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-28 14:43 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-09-01 8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-01 8:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-14 9:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-10-14 9:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-14 12:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-10-14 14:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-14 15:04 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-08-26 9:27 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-09-01 4:50 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] sched/topology: Unify tl_smt_mask() across core and all arch K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 5:13 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-26 8:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-26 8:11 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-26 8:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] sched/topology: Unify tl_cls_mask() across core and x86 K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 5:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] sched/topology: Unify tl_mc_mask() across core and all arch K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 5:15 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-26 4:13 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] sched/topology: Unify tl_pkg_mask() " K Prateek Nayak
2025-08-26 5:16 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-08-26 10:05 ` [PATCH v7 0/8] sched/fair: Get rid of sched_domains_curr_level hack for tl->cpumask() Shrikanth Hegde
2025-08-26 10:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-08-29 7:53 ` Valentin Schneider
2025-08-29 8:53 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2025-09-01 4:39 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-09-01 8:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-01 17:06 ` Shrikanth Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5ec9ca8a-9ba9-4600-a7a2-f7bd790fca83@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chenl311@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=easwar.hariharan@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=guoweikang.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=huschle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=maobibo@loongson.cn \
--cc=meted@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).