LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: "npiggin@gmail.com" <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/irq: Allow softirq to hardirq stack transition
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 11:06:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5fde4779-04f5-4fd6-a8ac-9cb2cbf7409a@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231130125045.3080961-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au>



Le 30/11/2023 à 13:50, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> Allow a transition from the softirq stack to the hardirq stack when
> handling a hardirq. Doing so means a hardirq received while deep in
> softirq processing is less likely to cause a stack overflow of the
> softirq stack.
> 
> Previously it wasn't safe to do so because irq_exit() (which initiates
> softirq processing) was called on the hardirq stack.
> 
> That was changed in commit 1b1b6a6f4cc0 ("powerpc: handle irq_enter/
> irq_exit in interrupt handler wrappers") and 1346d00e1bdf ("powerpc:
> Don't select HAVE_IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK").
> 
> The allowed transitions are now:
>   - process stack -> hardirq stack
>   - process stack -> softirq stack
>   - process stack -> softirq stack -> hardirq stack
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>


Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>



> ---
>   arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c | 5 ++---
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
> index 6f7d4edaa0bc..7504ceec5c58 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/irq.c
> @@ -284,15 +284,14 @@ static __always_inline void call_do_irq(struct pt_regs *regs, void *sp)
>   void __do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)
>   {
>   	struct pt_regs *old_regs = set_irq_regs(regs);
> -	void *cursp, *irqsp, *sirqsp;
> +	void *cursp, *irqsp;
>   
>   	/* Switch to the irq stack to handle this */
>   	cursp = (void *)(current_stack_pointer & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1));
>   	irqsp = hardirq_ctx[raw_smp_processor_id()];
> -	sirqsp = softirq_ctx[raw_smp_processor_id()];
>   
>   	/* Already there ? If not switch stack and call */
> -	if (unlikely(cursp == irqsp || cursp == sirqsp))
> +	if (unlikely(cursp == irqsp))
>   		__do_irq(regs, current_stack_pointer);
>   	else
>   		call_do_irq(regs, irqsp);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-05 11:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-30 12:50 [PATCH] powerpc/irq: Allow softirq to hardirq stack transition Michael Ellerman
2023-11-30 15:15 ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-01 10:05   ` Michael Ellerman
2023-12-01 10:11     ` Christophe Leroy
2023-12-05 11:06 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2024-03-13 13:19 ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5fde4779-04f5-4fd6-a8ac-9cb2cbf7409a@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox