From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/5] powerpc: kprobes: factor out code to emulate instruction into a helper
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:28:27 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6058a453bd013d5fad41201c01915889cccb0ac6.1491991939.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1491991939.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1491991939.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This helper will be used in a subsequent patch to emulate instructions
on re-entering the kprobe handler. No functional change.
Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
index 0732a0291ace..8b48f7d046bd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -207,6 +207,35 @@ void __kprobes arch_prepare_kretprobe(struct kretprobe_instance *ri,
regs->link = (unsigned long)kretprobe_trampoline;
}
+int __kprobes try_to_emulate(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ int ret;
+ unsigned int insn = *p->ainsn.insn;
+
+ /* regs->nip is also adjusted if emulate_step returns 1 */
+ ret = emulate_step(regs, insn);
+ if (ret > 0) {
+ /*
+ * Once this instruction has been boosted
+ * successfully, set the boostable flag
+ */
+ if (unlikely(p->ainsn.boostable == 0))
+ p->ainsn.boostable = 1;
+ } else if (ret < 0) {
+ /*
+ * We don't allow kprobes on mtmsr(d)/rfi(d), etc.
+ * So, we should never get here... but, its still
+ * good to catch them, just in case...
+ */
+ printk("Can't step on instruction %x\n", insn);
+ BUG();
+ } else if (ret == 0)
+ /* This instruction can't be boosted */
+ p->ainsn.boostable = -1;
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
int __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct kprobe *p;
@@ -302,18 +331,9 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
ss_probe:
if (p->ainsn.boostable >= 0) {
- unsigned int insn = *p->ainsn.insn;
+ ret = try_to_emulate(p, regs);
- /* regs->nip is also adjusted if emulate_step returns 1 */
- ret = emulate_step(regs, insn);
if (ret > 0) {
- /*
- * Once this instruction has been boosted
- * successfully, set the boostable flag
- */
- if (unlikely(p->ainsn.boostable == 0))
- p->ainsn.boostable = 1;
-
if (p->post_handler)
p->post_handler(p, regs, 0);
@@ -321,17 +341,7 @@ int __kprobes kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
reset_current_kprobe();
preempt_enable_no_resched();
return 1;
- } else if (ret < 0) {
- /*
- * We don't allow kprobes on mtmsr(d)/rfi(d), etc.
- * So, we should never get here... but, its still
- * good to catch them, just in case...
- */
- printk("Can't step on instruction %x\n", insn);
- BUG();
- } else if (ret == 0)
- /* This instruction can't be boosted */
- p->ainsn.boostable = -1;
+ }
}
prepare_singlestep(p, regs);
kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_SS;
--
2.12.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-12 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-12 10:58 [PATCH v2 0/5] powerpc: a few kprobe fixes and refactoring Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] kprobes: convert kprobe_lookup_name() to a function Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-13 3:09 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-04-18 12:52 ` David Laight
2017-04-19 8:08 ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-19 8:48 ` David Laight
2017-04-19 11:07 ` 'Naveen N. Rao'
2017-04-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] powerpc: kprobes: fix handling of function offsets on ABIv2 Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-13 4:28 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-04-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] powerpc: introduce a new helper to obtain function entry points Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-13 4:32 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-04-13 5:52 ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-12 10:58 ` Naveen N. Rao [this message]
2017-04-13 4:34 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] powerpc: kprobes: factor out code to emulate instruction into a helper Masami Hiramatsu
2017-04-13 5:53 ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-13 8:50 ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] powerpc: kprobes: emulate instructions on kprobe handler re-entry Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-13 4:37 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2017-04-13 5:53 ` Naveen N. Rao
2017-04-13 3:02 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] powerpc: a few kprobe fixes and refactoring Masami Hiramatsu
2017-04-13 5:50 ` Naveen N. Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6058a453bd013d5fad41201c01915889cccb0ac6.1491991939.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ananth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).