From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68A14DDE21 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:26:23 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <6115D7FB-7500-4F67-B02B-B64B92B33D1A@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior In-Reply-To: <20081015085904.GA28369@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2) Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: enforce a non-spe kernel build even on broken compilers Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:25:54 -0500 References: <20080901142302.GA13754@www.tglx.de> <76A823BD-A9B8-4FB4-B09B-F818687193CA@kernel.crashing.org> <20081014224946.GA2503@www.tglx.de> <20081015085904.GA28369@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Nate Case , ths@linutronix.de List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Oct 15, 2008, at 3:59 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > * Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2008-10-15 00:49:46 [+0200]: > >>> is the -mabi=no-spe really needed? >> It seems to work the other way around (without -mabi=no-spe but with >> -mabi=no-spe) alteast I did not find anything in do_syslog() or while >> browsing through the dissasm. I do a boot check tomorrow. > > Okay. I recompiled with -mspe=no and was able to boot without trouble. > It didn't work with -mabi=no-spe. I'm confused.. what did you change from your patch? - k