From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 774601A0BF4 for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:25:28 +1100 (AEDT) From: Arnd Bergmann To: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.0-rc1 Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 12:24:38 +0100 Message-ID: <6141970.YzWJy8akUr@wuerfel> In-Reply-To: References: <1424680402-3477-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org> <5721217.aGU5oqfDWo@wuerfel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Matthew Wilcox , ALSA Development Mailing List , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Monday 23 February 2015 11:28:12 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Monday 23 February 2015 10:14:55 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> >> > + /home/kisskb/slave/src/fs/dax.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'copy_user_page' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 266:2 > > > I checked the other architectures, and found that the same is missing on > > ARC, so we should add both: > > > > diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig > > index ec35851e5b71..a24d496787d6 100644 > > --- a/fs/Kconfig > > +++ b/fs/Kconfig > > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ source "fs/nilfs2/Kconfig" > > config FS_DAX > > bool "Direct Access (DAX) support" > > depends on MMU > > - depends on !(ARM || MIPS || SPARC) > > + depends on !(ARC || ARM || MIPS || SH || SPARC) > > help > > Direct Access (DAX) can be used on memory-backed block devices. > > If the block device supports DAX and the filesystem supports DAX, > > > > > > It's also not implemented on c6x and blackfin, but both of them have > > MMU=n, so they are already excluded. > > Exactly. > > Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Thanks, let me submit that as a proper patch with a changelog then. Arnd