From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E09E268734 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 06:05:52 +1100 (EST) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i2so660298wra for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 11:05:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <61cc712d0511201058p367df361i7e46591336918712@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 10:58:26 -0800 From: Kylo Ginsberg To: Wolfgang Denk In-Reply-To: <20051119152413.D0B44353BEF@atlas.denx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <6AD9F6A5F6E096408F0B703773355A0765E931@CHN-SNR-MBX01.wipro.com> <20051119152413.D0B44353BEF@atlas.denx.de> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Memtest-SDRAM List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 11/19/05, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > In message <6AD9F6A5F6E096408F0B703773355A0765E931@CHN-SNR-MBX01.wipro.co= m> you wrote: > > > > Can I comprehensively test and conform that my SDRAM is creating > > problem other than mtest at u-boot( which I already implemented the > > mtest with the help of mailing list , where my memory failed . ) , if i= s > > there is a way please do let me know . > > A simple test is: if Linux is running without problems under load > than there are no problems with your SDRAM. Yes, but determining the proper load to test with can be tricky.=20 E.g., I had a subtle memory timing issue that only turned up under very peculiar circumstances under linux; this was very difficult to reproduce until I started using a simple user-space memory tester application, which could very reliably produce failures. Fwiw, I started with this: http://pyropus.ca/software/memtester/ Cheers, Kylo