linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [mm v2 0/3] Support memory cgroup hotplug
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 19:37:16 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <61dc32fd-2802-6deb-24cf-fa11b5b31532@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161123080744.GG2864@dhcp22.suse.cz>



On 23/11/16 19:07, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 23-11-16 18:50:42, Balbir Singh wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 23/11/16 18:25, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Wed 23-11-16 15:36:51, Balbir Singh wrote:
>>>> In the absence of hotplug we use extra memory proportional to
>>>> (possible_nodes - online_nodes) * number_of_cgroups. PPC64 has a patch
>>>> to disable large consumption with large number of cgroups. This patch
>>>> adds hotplug support to memory cgroups and reverts the commit that
>>>> limited possible nodes to online nodes.
>>>
>>> Balbir,
>>> I have asked this in the previous version but there still seems to be a
>>> lack of information of _why_ do we want this, _how_ much do we save on
>>> the memory overhead on most systems and _why_ the additional complexity
>>> is really worth it. Please make sure to add all this in the cover
>>> letter.
>>>
>>
>> The data is in the patch referred to in patch 3. The order of waste was
>> 200MB for 400 cgroup directories enough for us to restrict possible_map
>> to online_map. These patches allow us to have a larger possible map and
>> allow onlining nodes not in the online_map, which is currently a restriction
>> on ppc64.
> 
> How common is to have possible_map >> online_map? If this is ppc64 then
> what is the downside of keeping the current restriction instead?
> 

On my system CONFIG_NODE_SHIFT is 8, 256 nodes and possible_nodes are 2
The downside is the ability to hotplug and online an offline node.
Please see http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg116724.html

>> A typical system that I use has about 100-150 directories, depending on the
>> number of users/docker instances/configuration/virtual machines. These numbers
>> will only grow as we pack more of these instances on them.
>>
>> From a complexity view point, the patches are quite straight forward.
> 
> Well, I would like to hear more about that. {get,put}_online_memory
> at random places doesn't sound all that straightforward to me.
> 

I thought those places were not random :) I tried to think them out as
discussed with Vladimir. I don't claim the code is bug free, we can fix
any bugs as we test this more.

Balbir Singh.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-23  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-23  4:36 [mm v2 0/3] Support memory cgroup hotplug Balbir Singh
2016-11-23  4:36 ` [mm v2 1/3] mm: Add basic infrastructure for memcg hotplug support Balbir Singh
2016-11-23  4:36 ` [mm v2 2/3] mm: Move operations to hotplug callbacks Balbir Singh
2016-11-23  4:36 ` [mm v2 3/3] powerpc/mm: fix node_possible_map limitations Balbir Singh
2016-11-23  7:25 ` [mm v2 0/3] Support memory cgroup hotplug Michal Hocko
2016-11-23  7:50   ` Balbir Singh
2016-11-23  8:07     ` Michal Hocko
2016-11-23  8:37       ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2016-11-23  9:28         ` Michal Hocko
2016-11-23 13:05           ` Balbir Singh
2016-11-23 13:22             ` Michal Hocko
2016-11-28 21:10             ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-29  0:09               ` Balbir Singh
2016-11-29  0:42                 ` Tejun Heo
2016-11-29  4:57                   ` Balbir Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=61dc32fd-2802-6deb-24cf-fa11b5b31532@gmail.com \
    --to=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).