From: Leonardo Bras <leonardo@linux.ibm.com>
To: Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@gmail.com>
Cc: ndfont@gmail.com, linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
arbab@linux.ibm.com, Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] powerpc/kernel: Enables memory hot-remove after reboot on pseries guests
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 04:18:32 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <621dd76a8e0b449db66ba2c3ad20fb2c743a1f1b.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGZKiBr=8i11YPDn+1y5j6YfGj+tVbbTKakoGje9QQ8TEw9g5g@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1095 bytes --]
Hello Bharata, thanks for this feedback!
On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 10:13 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried this a few years back
> (https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/800142/) and didn't pursue it
> further because at that time, it was felt that the approach might not
> work for PowerVM guests, because all the present memory except RMA
> gets marked as hot-pluggable by PowerVM. This discussion is not
> present in the above thread, but during my private discussions with
> Reza and Nathan, it was noted that making all that memory as MOVABLE
> is not preferable for PowerVM guests as we might run out of memory for
> kernel allocations.
Humm, this makes sense.
But with mu change, these pieces of memory only get into ZONE_MOVABLE
if the boot parameter 'movable_node' gets passed to guest kernel.
So, even if we are unable to sort out some flag combination that work
fine for both use-cases, if PowerVM don't pass 'movable_node' as boot
parameter to kernel, it will behave just as today.
What are your thoughts on that?
Best regards,
Leonardo Bras
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-04 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-28 6:04 [PATCH 1/1] powerpc/kernel: Enables memory hot-remove after reboot on pseries guests Leonardo Bras
2020-03-04 4:43 ` Bharata B Rao
2020-03-04 7:18 ` Leonardo Bras [this message]
2020-03-04 22:05 ` Leonardo Bras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=621dd76a8e0b449db66ba2c3ad20fb2c743a1f1b.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=leonardo@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=arbab@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bharata.rao@gmail.com \
--cc=cclaudio@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ndfont@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).