From: Radu Rendec <radu.rendec@gmail.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: PowerPC arch_ptrace() writes beyond thread_struct/task_struct
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2019 09:45:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <62eaddb44743811a8b2cf4da5aa85f5b61662539.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84012c6a-befa-5091-ee13-4da5d5eb7d75@c-s.fr>
On Thu, 2019-06-06 at 07:15 +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
> Le 05/06/2019 à 23:45, Radu Rendec a écrit :
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > I'm seeing some weird memory corruption that I have been able to isolate
> > to arch_ptrace() [arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c] and PTRACE_POKEUSR. I am
> > on PowerPC 32 (MPC8378), kernel 4.9.179.
> >
> > It's not very easy for me to test on the latest kernel, but I guess
> > little has changed since 4.9 in either the architecture specific ptrace
> > code or PowerPC register data structures.
> >
> > What happens is that gdb calls ptrace(PTRACE_POKEUSER) with addr=0x158.
> > This goes down to arch_ptrace() [arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c], inside
> > `case PTRACE_POKEUSR`, on the branch that does this:
> >
> > memcpy(&child->thread.TS_FPR(fpidx), &data,
> > sizeof(long));
> >
> > where:
> > index = addr >> 2 = 0x56 = 86
> > fpidx = index - PT_FPR0 = 86 - 48 = 38
>
> In struct thread_fp_state, fpr field is u64, so I guess we should have
> the following on PPC32:
>
> fpidx = (index - PT_FPR0) >> 1;
I guess this would only apply to PPC32, since everything up to fpidx is
calculated in units of sizeof(long) - which is 4 on PPC32 and 8 on
PPC64. But fpr[0:31] is always u64.
It also looks odd that only sizeof(long) bytes are ever copied for any
given fpr[fpidx], which means one half of the u64 is never accessible on
PPC32.
Ont other thing I don't get is the "+1" in the definition of PT_FPSCR
for PPC32:
#define PT_FPSCR (PT_FPR0 + 2*32 + 1)
Looking at struct thread_fp_state, fpscr follows immediately after
fpr[31]. Is the FPSCR register only 32-bit on PPC32? Is it stored in the
2nd half of (struct thread_fp_state).fpscr? This line:
child->thread.fp_state.fpscr = data;
suggests so. And in that case, the "+1" in PT_FPSCR makes sense, but
only for big endian: assigning `data` (which is "long", 32-bit) to the
`fpscr` field (which is "u64") would go to the higher address, which is
indeed "+1" in units of 32-bit words.
Then there is also a problem is the condition that determines whether
memcpy() is used to access one of the fpr[0:31] or fpscr is assigned
directly:
if (fpidx < (PT_FPSCR - PT_FPR0))
The case when the supplied addr points to the lower half of fpscr (which
is unused on PPC32?) erroneously indexes into fpr[0:31].
Is there any documentation of what "addr" is supposed to mean?
> > &child->thread.TS_FPR(fpidx) = (void *)child + 1296
> >
> > offsetof(struct task_struct, thread) = 960
> > sizeof(struct thread_struct) = 336
> > sizeof(struct task_struct) = 1296
> >
> > In other words, the memcpy() call writes just beyond thread_struct
> > (which is also beyond task_struct, for that matter).
> >
> > This should never get past the bounds checks for `index`, so perhaps
> > there is a mismatch between ptrace macros and the actual register data
> > structures layout.
> >
> > I will continue to investigate, but I'm not familiar with the PowerPC
> > registers so it will take a while before I make sense of all the data
> > structures and macros. Hopefully this rings a bell to someone who is
> > already familiar with those and could figure out quickly what the
> > problem is.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-06 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-05 21:45 PowerPC arch_ptrace() writes beyond thread_struct/task_struct Radu Rendec
2019-06-06 5:15 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-06-06 13:45 ` Radu Rendec [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=62eaddb44743811a8b2cf4da5aa85f5b61662539.camel@gmail.com \
--to=radu.rendec@gmail.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).