From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-in-07.arcor-online.net (mail-in-07.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.arcor.de", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F98DDF69 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:44:40 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <46725D02.9090806@ru.mvista.com> References: <1181729973.25586.31.camel@dolphin.spb.rtsoft.ru> <467176EB.7060404@ru.mvista.com> <20070614222620.GA17382@mag.az.mvista.com> <46725411.3080002@ru.mvista.com> <46725D02.9090806@ru.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <63193b592eea9422036fc63f0899bb7b@kernel.crashing.org> From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] powerpc: MPC7450 L2 HW cache flush feature utilization Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 12:44:32 +0200 To: "Vladislav D. Buzov" Cc: linuxppc-dev list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >> Do fix the comment though ;-) > Once somebody tests the patch on other 7450 processors I'll remove the > comment and send a new patch. Is it ok? Or I should create a new patch > first? No, this is perfectly fine. Thanks! Segher